Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;10:e65878. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65878

Table 2. Number of data points in the plots.

Figures
Figure 2D Figure 3A Figure 3B,E Figure 4C–F Figure 6C Figures 6D, 7C,D
Fly Genotype Stance Swing
1 Berlin K 8 9 1 0 2 2 0
2 Berlin K 4 9 0 0 0 0 0
3 Berlin K 152 194 20 15 42 14 6
4 Berlin K 284 330 40 46 82 78 78
5 Berlin K 72 90 10 12 21 18 18
6 Berlin K 108 114 16 17 31 28 28
7 Berlin K 367 458 43 53 97 74 74
8 Berlin K 388 454 47 59 102 44 44
9 Berlin K 50 63 5 7 9 0 0
10 W1118 1496 1564 202 227 390 90 90
11 Oregon RC 45 53 5 6 5 0 0
12 Tac 3 265 325 32 42 63 5 0
13 Berlin K 165 209 17 26 38 9 9
14 Berlin K 53 63 5 9 14 4 0
Total 3457 3935 443 519 896 366 347

Data used for Figure 2D were stance and swing durations for each of the six legs. Data used for Figure 3A,B and E were derived from all complete gait cycles that include at least one frame of the last leg’s stance phase. Data for Figure 3A had an additional constraint that required a cycle data to have complete observation of the last leg’s stance phase from start to end. Data used for Figure 4 were derived from all tripod stance phase. Data used for Figure 6 and 7 were derived from tripod stance phases in which the single support phase constitutes at least 25% of stance. However, additional constraints were added to Figure 6D and 7: data with erroneous leg position tracks were eliminated, and then flies with less than six steps were eliminated.