Table 1.
ID | Author (publication year) | Effective factors in academic performance | Measurement method | Type of R | Type of analysis | Location | Type of study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kleijn (1994) | Study habits | SMART | R=0.4 | multiple regression analysis | Amsterdam | Prospective |
2 | Kleijn (1994) | Anxiety | Dutch adaptation of Spielberger test anxiety inventory | R=-0.3 | Pearson correlation | Amsterdam | Prospective |
3 | Kleijn (1994) | Anxiety | Dutch adaptation of Spielberger Test Anxiety Inventory | R=-0.57 | Pearson correlation | Amsterdam | Prospective |
4 | Kleijn (1994) | Anxiety | Dutch adaptation of Spielberger Test Anxiety Inventory | R=-0.32 | Pearson correlation | Amsterdam | Prospective |
5 | West (2011) | Study strategies | Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI) | Β=0.32 | regression | Texas | Correlational |
6 | West (2011) | Study strategies | Learning and study strategies inventory (LASSI) | Β=0.43 | regression | Texas | Correlational |
7 | Kumar (2014) | Effect of stress | Semi-structured Performa and stress scale | R=0.17 | Pearson correlation coefficient | India | Correlational |
8 | Sohail (2013) | Stress | Researcher-made | R=-0.58 | Spearman | Lahore | Correlational |
9 | Stewart (1999) | Stress | State trait-anxiety inventory | R=-0.16 | Pearson | Hong Kong | Prospective longitudinal |
SMART=Study management and academic results test