a, Schematics of chromosome location peak deletions in
MTC GBM (n = 153 tumors) identified using GISTIC2
(Benjamini Hochberg FDR q-value < 0.01;
q-value of chromosome bands are reported in Supplementary Table
16b). b, The matrix of homozygous deleted genes
identified by UNCOVER as associated with MTC NES in primary GBM
(n = 487 tumors; p = 0.034,
permutation test). Top row, blue to yellow: higher to lower NES values for
samples (columns). Deletions in each sample are in dark blue; samples not
deleted are in yellow. The last row shows the alteration profile from the
entire analysis. The bar plot on the right side indicates the gene weight
for each alteration. c, Association of homozygous deletions in
each GBM subtype. Circles are color-coded and their dimension reflects the
-log10(p-value) of the enrichment
(n = 487 tumors; p-value, two-sided
Fisher’s exact test; see Supplementary Table 16g). Blue
to red scale indicates positive to negative association. d,
Frequency of genetic alterations of GBM driver genes in
SLC45A1-deleted (n = 20 tumors)
compared to SLC45A1 wild-type GBM (n = 705
tumors). The bottom track indicates the dataset (green, TCGA; blue, GLASS).
Asterisk, p = 2.33e-03, two-sided Fisher’s Exact
test (n = 725 tumors). e, Sample density plot
depicting the relative frequency distribution of CCF estimated for the
genetic alterations occurring in SLC45A1-deleted GBM
(n = 20 tumors). Blue dot, CCF of
SLC45A1 deletion. f, Evolutionary trees of
genetic alterations in primary and recurrent
SLC45A1-deleted GBM (n = 8 matched primary
and recurrent tumor pairs); yellow, red and black branches are truncal,
primary private and recurrent private alterations, respectively; the length
of branches is proportional to the number of genetic alterations. GBM driver
genes are indicated. g, PCR amplification of genomic DNA shows
deletion of SLC45A1 in PDC-002 and PDC-064. h,
Immunoblot of FLAG-SLC45A1 in PDC-002, PDC-064 (harboring
SLC45A1 deletion) and PDC-078 (SLC45A1
wild type). Experiments in g, h were repeated two times with similar
results. See Source Data
Extended Data Fig. 10.