Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;15:578369. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2021.578369

Table 6.

PD vs. HC classification EER (in %) obtained with different classifiers: MFCC-GMM baseline, and x-vectors combined either with cosine similarity (alone and with LDA) or with PLDA, with and without data augmentation.

High-quality microphone Telephone
Males Females Males Females
Repet Monol Repet Monol Repet Monol Repet Monol
MFCC-GMM 22 26 42 45 35 36 42 40
x-vec + cos 32 35 51 41 39 33 49 43
x-vec + LDA + cos 22 27 39 32 32 35 34 34
x-vec + augLDA + cos 24 25 34 30 33 33 39 33
x-vec + PLDA 24 28 39 35 33 36 34 36
x-vec + augPLDA 25 25 33 30 31 33 37 33

The datasets used are male and female high-quality microphone and telephone recordings. Analyzed tasks are free speech (monolog) and sentence repetitions (combined with readings for high-quality microphone recordings). Bold numbers indicate the best EERs for each dataset.