Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;190(3):439–447. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa204

Table 2.

Analyses of Associations of Body Mass Index With Beta-Diversity at Taxonomic Level 6 (Genus)a

Dissimilarity Standard Reference Method MiRKAT
Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 2-df  
P Value
5-df  
P Value
P Value
Bray-Curtis
 Mainb 2.27(0.98)c 7.96(5.12) 0.0406c
 Quadraticd 1.62(1.14) 4.15(10.67) 6.84(5.89) −38.98(73.08) −16.06(47.87) 0.0012c 0.0102c
Unweighted UniFrac
 Mainb 2.67(3.37) −1.43(3.88) 0.6696
 Quadraticd −1.41(3.90) 0.83(4.12) 62.72(41.06) 132.7(85.71) −41.99(94.86) 0.0116c 0.0020c
Weighted UniFrac
 Mainb 2.89(2.25) 1.90(6.49) 0.1924
 Quadraticd −3.19(3.34) −13.41(9.53) 12.55(20.93) −223.3(113.60)c −131.6(102.90) 2.03 ×10–5c 0.0347c

Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom; MiRKAT, microbiome regression-based kernel association test; se, standard error; UniFrac, unique fraction.

a Analysis of data from the American Gut Project (12). Regression coefficient estimates and their standard errors (se) are denoted, for example, by Inline graphic. All analyses include age and sex in the models to adjust for potential confounding by these factors.

b Main effects for distance to stool and distance to nasal samples (Xstool and Xnasal; see Methods).

c Statistically significant association at 0.05 level.

d Model also includes (Xstool)2, (Xnasal)2 , and (Xstool) (Xnasal).