1.
单药免疫治疗临床研究
Clinical trials of ICI monotherapy
| Study | Phase | Histology, PD-L1 | Line | Study design | Key findings | HR (95%CI) |
| PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1; ICIs: immune checkpoint inhibitors; TPS: tumor proportion score; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; mOS: median overall survival; mPFS: median progression-free survival; Chemo: chemotherapy. | ||||||
| KEYNOTE-024[18] | Ⅲ | NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥50% | First-line | Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy | mOS: 30.0 mon vs 14.2 mon | 0.63 (0.47-0.86) |
| KEYNOTE-042[19] | Ⅲ | NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% | First-line | Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy | mOS: 16.7 mon vs 12.1 mon | 0.85 (0.71-0.93) |
| KEYNOTE-010[20] | Ⅱ/Ⅲ | NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% | Second-line | Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or10 mg/kg vs docetaxel | mOS: 10.4 mon vs 8.5 mon (2 mg/kg); mOS: 12.7 mon vs 8.5 mon (10 mg/kg) | 2 mg/kg: 0.7110 mg/kg: 0.61 |
| CheckMate026[21] | Ⅲ | NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% | First-line | Nivolumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy | mOS: 14.4 mon vs 13.2 mon | 1.02 (0.80-1.30) |
| MYSTIC[22] | Ⅲ | NSCLC | First-line | Durvalumab vs valumab+Tremelimumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy | mOS: 16.3 mon vs 12.9 mon(D vs Chemo)mOS: 11.9 mon vs 12.9 mon(D+T vs Chemo) | D vs Chemo 0.76 (0.56-1.02)D+T vs Chemo 0.85 (0.61-1.17) |
| CheckMate017[23] | Ⅲ | Squamous | Second-line | Nivolumab vs docetaxel | mOS: 9.2 mon vs 6.0 mon | 0.62 (0.47-0.80) |
| CheckMate057[24] | Ⅲ | Nonsquamous | Second-line | Nivolumab vs docetaxel | mOS: 12.2 mon vs 9.4 mon | 0.75 (0.63-0.91) |
| OAK[25] | Ⅲ | NSCLC | Second-line | Atezolizumab vs docetaxel | mOS: 13.8 mon vs 9.6 mon | 0.73 (0.62-0.87) |