Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 20;24(2):131–140. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.06

1.

单药免疫治疗临床研究

Clinical trials of ICI monotherapy

Study Phase Histology, PD-L1 Line Study design Key findings HR (95%CI)
PD-L1: programmed cell death ligand 1; ICIs: immune checkpoint inhibitors; TPS: tumor proportion score; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; mOS: median overall survival; mPFS: median progression-free survival; Chemo: chemotherapy.
KEYNOTE-024[18] NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥50% First-line Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy mOS: 30.0 mon vs 14.2 mon 0.63 (0.47-0.86)
KEYNOTE-042[19] NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% First-line Pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy mOS: 16.7 mon vs 12.1 mon 0.85 (0.71-0.93)
KEYNOTE-010[20] Ⅱ/Ⅲ NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% Second-line Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or10 mg/kg vs docetaxel mOS: 10.4 mon vs 8.5 mon (2 mg/kg); mOS: 12.7 mon vs 8.5 mon (10 mg/kg) 2 mg/kg: 0.7110 mg/kg: 0.61
CheckMate026[21] NSCLC, PD-L1 TPS≥1% First-line Nivolumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy mOS: 14.4 mon vs 13.2 mon 1.02 (0.80-1.30)
MYSTIC[22] NSCLC First-line Durvalumab vs valumab+Tremelimumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy mOS: 16.3 mon vs 12.9 mon(D vs Chemo)mOS: 11.9 mon vs 12.9 mon(D+T vs Chemo) D vs Chemo 0.76 (0.56-1.02)D+T vs Chemo 0.85 (0.61-1.17)
CheckMate017[23] Squamous Second-line Nivolumab vs docetaxel mOS: 9.2 mon vs 6.0 mon 0.62 (0.47-0.80)
CheckMate057[24] Nonsquamous Second-line Nivolumab vs docetaxel mOS: 12.2 mon vs 9.4 mon 0.75 (0.63-0.91)
OAK[25] NSCLC Second-line Atezolizumab vs docetaxel mOS: 13.8 mon vs 9.6 mon 0.73 (0.62-0.87)