Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 10;100(3):100903. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.072

Table 6.

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of the tested APEC isolates against 14 antimicrobial agents.

Resistance pattern Antimicrobial class No. of antimicrobial class No. of resistant isolates Percentage
AUG2, AMP, FOX, AXO, GEN, STR, FIS, TET β-Lactam combination agents, penicillins, cephems, aminoglycosides, folate pathway antagonists, tetracyclines 6 8 21.6%
AMP, STR, TET, FIS, SXT Penicillins, aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, folate pathway antagonists 4 2 5.4%
GEN, TET, SXT Aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, folate pathway antagonists 3 4 10.8%
AMP, TET Penicillins, tetracyclines 2 4 10.8%
AMP, GEN Penicillins, aminoglycosides 2 2 5.4%
GEN, TET Aminoglycosides, tetracyclines 2 2 5.4%
GEN, STR, FIS Aminoglycosides, folate pathway antagonists 2 1 2.7%
TET Tetracyclines 1 3 8.1%
None None 0 11 29.7%

Abbreviations: AMP, ampicillin; APEC, avian pathogenic Escherichia coli; AUG2, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid; AXO, ceftriaxone; FIS, sulfisoxazole; FOX, cefoxitin; GEN, gentamicin; STR, streptomycin; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; TET, tetracycline.