Table 5.
Item | Dietary treatments |
Pooled SEM | Model P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | PC | 0.30% LB | 0.90% LB | 1.50% LB | |||
Body weight, g/chick | |||||||
Day 0 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 1.3 | 1.000 |
Day 10 | 297a,b | 310a | 310a | 277b,c | 270c | 8.5 | 0.002 |
Day 21 | 980b | 1,089a | 1,088a | 932c | 807d | 14.0 | <0.001 |
Day 35 | 2,042b | 2,333a | 2,340a | 2,119b | 1,874c | 37.3 | <0.001 |
Body weight gain, g/chick | |||||||
Day 0–10 | 256a,b | 269a | 270a | 237b,c | 229c | 7.5 | <0.001 |
Day 10–21 | 683b | 774a | 763a | 652c | 536d | 10.7 | <0.001 |
Day 21–35 | 1,063b | 1,220a | 1,260a | 1,187a | 1,061b | 31.0 | <0.001 |
Day 0–35 | 2,001b | 2,291a | 2,299a | 2,078b | 1,834c | 37.2 | <0.001 |
Feed intake,2 g/chick | |||||||
Day 0–10 | 303a | 309a | 298a,b | 283b,c | 278c | 7.3 | 0.010 |
Day 10–21 | 940b,c | 995a | 954a,b | 892c | 811d | 19.5 | <0.001 |
Day 21–35 | 2,029a,b | 2,154a | 2,106a | 1,943b,c | 1,847c | 46.6 | <0.001 |
Day 0–35 | 3,147b,c | 3,351a | 3,192a,b | 2,973c,d | 2,813d | 68.9 | <0.001 |
Feed conversion ratio,2 g/g | |||||||
Day 0–10 | 1.18b | 1.11c | 1.11c | 1.20a,b | 1.23a | 0.013 | <0.001 |
Day 10–21 | 1.38b | 1.32b | 1.25c | 1.37b | 1.51a | 0.025 | <0.001 |
Day 21–35 | 1.91a | 1.77b | 1.69b | 1.64b | 1.75b | 0.046 | 0.001 |
Day 0–35 | 1.57a | 1.41b,c | 1.39c | 1.46b | 1.56a | 0.025 | <0.001 |
a–dMeans without a common superscript letter differ within a row (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: LB, Lys biomass; NC, negative control; PC, positive control.
Values are least square means derived at 2 to 37 d post-hatch (study day 0–35) from between 9 and 12 replicate cages allotted with 6 chicks at study initiation.
Values have been corrected for mortality.