Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;100(3):100967. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.064

Table 2.

Effects of hulless barley and β-glucanase on β-glucan molecular weight in the ileal content of broiler chickens aged 28 d.

Hulless barley (%) β-glucanase (%) Molecular weight (g/mol)
Mp1 Mw MW-10%
0 0 21,536 30,486a,b 9,414a
0.01 18,276 22,427b,c 5,702b
0.1 14,324 14,620c,d 2,342c
30 0 19,652 35,863a 5,584b
0.01 13,255 22,217b,c 3,359c
0.1 8,952 10,347d 2,025c
60 0 19,799 36,199a 6,099b
0.01 14,893 16,948c,d 3,407c
0.1 7,793 8,434d 1,955c
SEM2 746.8 1507.8 363.7
Main effects
 Hulless barley (%)
 0 18,045a 22,511 5,819
 30 13,953b 22,809 3,656
 60 14,162b 20,527 3,820
 β-Glucanase (%)
 0 20,329a 34,183 7,032
 0.01 15,475b 20,531 4,156
 0.1 10,356c 11,134 2,107
ANOVA P-value
 Hulless barley <0.001 0.363 <0.001
 β-Glucanase <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
 Hulless barley × β-glucanase 0.206 0.035 0.001

a–dMeans within a main effect or interaction not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

1

Mp = peak molecular weight; Mw = weight average molecular weight; MW-10% = maximum molecular weight for the smallest 10% molecules.

2

SEM = pooled SEM (n = 6 cages per treatment).