Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 29;100(3):100967. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.064

Table 7.

Effects of hulless barley and β-glucanase on the gastrointestinal pH of broiler chickens aged 28 d.

Hulless barley (%) BGase1 (%) Crop Gizzard Duodenum Jejunum Ileum Ceca Colon
0 0 5.08 3.33 6.09 5.93 6.73 5.85 6.63
0.01 5.41 3.58 6.05 5.99 6.98 6.09 6.56
0.1 5.08 3.51 6.07 6.01 6.87 5.75 6.52
30 0 5.56 3.33 6.06 5.91 7.05 5.99 6.99
0.01 5.30 3.20 6.09 5.95 6.98 5.83 6.88
0.1 5.18 3.48 6.18 5.96 7.08 5.77 6.69
60 0 5.29 3.54 6.05 5.99 7.08 6.02 6.92
0.01 4.87 3.50 6.16 5.97 7.12 5.84 6.98
0.1 5.23 3.26 6.19 6.01 7.26 6.04 7.17
SEM2 0.059 0.043 0.018 0.014 0.033 0.035 0.048
Main effects
 Hulless barley (%)
 0 5.19 3.47 6.07 5.98 6.86b 5.90 6.57b
 30 5.35 3.34 6.11 5.94 7.03a 5.86 6.85a
 60 5.13 3.43 6.13 5.99 7.15a 5.97 7.02a
 BGase (%)
 0 5.31 3.40 6.07 5.94 6.95 5.95 6.85
 0.01 5.19 3.43 6.10 5.97 7.02 5.92 6.80
 0.1 5.16 3.42 6.15 5.99 7.07 5.85 6.79
ANOVA P-value
 Hulless barley 0.257 0.314 0.339 0.336 0.004 0.453 0.003
 BGase 0.527 0.942 0.189 0.273 0.264 0.495 0.875
 Hulless barley × BGase 0.114 0.057 0.487 0.838 0.367 0.070 0.361

a,bMeans within a main effect or interaction not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

1

BGase = β-glucanase.

2

SEM = pooled SEM (n = 20 birds per treatment).