Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;118(9):e2021102118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021102118

Table 5.

Summary and comparison of BRDT and BRD4 activities for JQ1 and potent compounds from DEC-Tec hits and analogs

Compound BRDT IC50, nM BRDT-BD2 vs. BRDT-BD1 BRD4 IC50, nM BRDT-BD2 vs. BRD4-BD2 BRD4-BD2 vs. BRD4-BD1 t1/2,* min
BD2 BD1 BD2 BD1 MLM HLM
JQ1 (control) 154 85 0.6 60 60 0.4 1 15 6
8 (CDD-1132) 13 >10,000 >750 31 26,200 2.4 850 51 150
9 (CDD-1102) 7 10,100 1,440 15 4,460 2.1 300 92 150
10 (CDD-1126) 17 >10,000 >600 46 >10,000 2.7 >210 190 240
15 (CDD-1349) 22 NE§ ∼1,000 140 NE§ 6.4 >140 150 220
17 (CDD-1350) 47 36,200 770 51 25,100 1.1 490 200 490
20 (CDD-1302) 8 15,800 2,000 12 10,400 1.5 860 72 370
21 (CDD-1306) 14 19,700 1,400 21 14,100 1.5 670 9 180
22 (CDD-1310) 18 10,700 590 20 10,900 1.1 540 150 460
*

t1/2 measured using liver microsomal stability assay; assay data >60 min are an extrapolated estimate and included for relative determination of the half-life.

Inhibition is 11% at 10 µM for BRDT-BD1.

Inhibition is 16% at 10 µM for BRDT-BD1 and 20% at 10 µM for BRD4-BD1.

§

NE: no effect at 20 µM in the AlphaScreen assay.