Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;42(9):919–933. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa1040

Table 2.

Comparative associations of the 8 novel loci and the ABO locus with MI and CAD in the UK Biobank

MI vs. Control (17 505/454 212)
CAD only vs. Control (15 580/454 212)
CAD+/MI+ vs. CAD+/MI (17 505/15 580)
SNP Chr Pos Nearest gene(s) EA/OA EAF OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
rs113716316 1p36.11 27 928 640 AHDC1 G/A 0.93 1.11 (1.07–1.16) 7.2 × 10−7 1.07 (1.02–1.12) 4.1 × 10−3 1.04 (0.98–1.11) 0.21
rs12743267 1p21.3 95 249 306 SLC44A3 C/T 0.76 1.04 (1.01–1.06) 3.1 × 10−3 1.00 (0.97–1.03) 0.98 1.04 (1.01–1.08) 0.02
rs6761276 2q13 113 832 312 IL1F10 T/C 0.42 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 1.9 × 10−3 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.44 1.03 (0.99–1.06) 0.11
rs12693302 2q32.1 183 211 443 PDE1A G/A 0.36 1.06 (1.03–1.08) 1.3 × 10−6 0.98 (0.96–1.01) 0.19 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 2.9 × 10−5
rs2452009 4q22.3 95 495 908 PDLIM5 A/G 0.70 1.04 (1.02–1.07) 2.6 × 10−4 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.68 1.03 (1.001–1.07) 0.04
rs28429551 9q34.3 139 243 334 GPSM1 A/T 0.76 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 4.8 × 10−8 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.54 1.07 (1.03–1.11) 2.8 × 10−4
rs8037798 15q24.2 75 240 030 COX5A-RPP25 G/T 0.24 1.05 (1.03–1.08) 3.2 × 10−5 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 0.85 1.06 (1.02–1.10) 1.7 × 10−3
rs9411377 9q34.2 136 145 404 ABO A/C 0.30 1.06 (1.04–1.09) 3.3 × 10−7 0.99 (0.97–1.02) 0.67 1.07 (1.03–1.10) 1.3 × 10−4

Number of cases and controls for each phenotype defined in the UK Biobank are shown in parentheses.

For CAD+/MI+ vs. CAD+/MI analyses, cases were defined as subjects positive for both CAD and MI; controls were defined as CAD positive subjects without MI.

Chr, chromosome; CI, confidence interval; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; OA, other allele; OR, odds ratio; P, P-value obtained from linear mixed model analysis in UK Biobank; Pos, base-pair position (hg19).