Table 2.
MI vs. Control (17 505/454 212) |
CAD only vs. Control (15 580/454 212) |
CAD+/MI+ vs. CAD+/MI− (17 505/15 580) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | Chr | Pos | Nearest gene(s) | EA/OA | EAF | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
rs113716316 | 1p36.11 | 27 928 640 | AHDC1 | G/A | 0.93 | 1.11 (1.07–1.16) | 7.2 × 10−7 | 1.07 (1.02–1.12) | 4.1 × 10−3 | 1.04 (0.98–1.11) | 0.21 |
rs12743267 | 1p21.3 | 95 249 306 | SLC44A3 | C/T | 0.76 | 1.04 (1.01–1.06) | 3.1 × 10−3 | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 0.98 | 1.04 (1.01–1.08) | 0.02 |
rs6761276 | 2q13 | 113 832 312 | IL1F10 | T/C | 0.42 | 1.03 (1.01–1.06) | 1.9 × 10−3 | 1.01 (0.99–1.03) | 0.44 | 1.03 (0.99–1.06) | 0.11 |
rs12693302 | 2q32.1 | 183 211 443 | PDE1A | G/A | 0.36 | 1.06 (1.03–1.08) | 1.3 × 10−6 | 0.98 (0.96–1.01) | 0.19 | 1.07 (1.04–1.10) | 2.9 × 10−5 |
rs2452009 | 4q22.3 | 95 495 908 | PDLIM5 | A/G | 0.70 | 1.04 (1.02–1.07) | 2.6 × 10−4 | 1.01 (0.98–1.03) | 0.68 | 1.03 (1.001–1.07) | 0.04 |
rs28429551 | 9q34.3 | 139 243 334 | GPSM1 | A/T | 0.76 | 1.07 (1.04–1.10) | 4.8 × 10−8 | 1.01 (0.98–1.03) | 0.54 | 1.07 (1.03–1.11) | 2.8 × 10−4 |
rs8037798 | 15q24.2 | 75 240 030 | COX5A-RPP25 | G/T | 0.24 | 1.05 (1.03–1.08) | 3.2 × 10−5 | 1.00 (0.97–1.02) | 0.85 | 1.06 (1.02–1.10) | 1.7 × 10−3 |
rs9411377 | 9q34.2 | 136 145 404 | ABO | A/C | 0.30 | 1.06 (1.04–1.09) | 3.3 × 10−7 | 0.99 (0.97–1.02) | 0.67 | 1.07 (1.03–1.10) | 1.3 × 10−4 |
Number of cases and controls for each phenotype defined in the UK Biobank are shown in parentheses.
For CAD+/MI+ vs. CAD+/MI− analyses, cases were defined as subjects positive for both CAD and MI; controls were defined as CAD positive subjects without MI.
Chr, chromosome; CI, confidence interval; EA, effect allele; EAF, effect allele frequency; OA, other allele; OR, odds ratio; P, P-value obtained from linear mixed model analysis in UK Biobank; Pos, base-pair position (hg19).