Table 3.
Outcomes | Usual Care Mean (SD) | Algorithm Mean (SD) | Contrast Between Groupsf |
---|---|---|---|
Sensory CIPN Severity | |||
T1a | 8.21 (11.77) | 7.48 (9.2) |
t = 0.06 p = 0.95 90% CI = − 2.64, 2.83 n = 136 |
T2a | 12.62 (12.83) | 9.47 (8.74) | |
T3c | 12.68 (12.38) | 11.21 (11.45) | |
Motor CIPN Severity | |||
T1a | 5.38 (8.7) | 4.93 (6.42) |
t = 0.12 p = 0.90 90% CI = −2.28, 2.64 n = 136 |
T2b | 7.32 (10.57) | 7.89 (8.91) | |
T3c | 8.98 (11.84) | 8.04 (9.33) | |
Worst CIPN Pain Intensity | |||
T1d | 1.38 (2.17) | 1.43 (1.79) |
t = 0.18 p = 0.86 90% CI = −0.53, 0.65 n = 134 |
T2e | 2.01 (2.54) | 1.97 (2.3) | |
T3c | 2.05 (2.34) | 1.90 (2.01) |
Table 3 describes changes in sensory CIPN severity, motor CIPN severity, and worst CIPN pain intensity severity from T1 to T3 between study phases
aN = 69 Usual Care, N = 71 Algorithm
bN = 69 Usual Care, N = 70 Algorithm
cN = 66 Usual Care, N = 72 Algorithm
dN = 69 Usual Care, N = 69 Algorithm
eN = 68 Usual Care, N = 71 Algorithm
fStatistical test to determine whether the change from T1 to T3 was different between study phases