Table 3.
2-Way ANOVA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Proximal Tibia μCT | ||||
BV/TV | 5.7 ± 0.4 | 10.5 ± 0.6D | 10.6 ± 0.3 D | OPG-Fc>VEH |
Conn.D | 30 ± 7 | 102 ± 10 | 113 ± 7 D | OPG-Fc>VEH |
SMI | 3.08 ± 0.06 | 2.52 ± 0.06 | 2.46 ± 0.03D | OPG-Fc<VEH |
Tb.N | 4.07 ± 0.07 | 4.88 ± 0.07D | 4.80 ± 0.08 | OPG-Fc>VEH |
Tb.Th | 35.9 ± 0.7 | 40.2 ± 0.9 | 40.1 ± 0.5D | SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH |
Tb.Sp | 247 ± 5 | 203 ± 4D | 206 ± 4 | OPG-Fc<VEH |
Proximal Humerus μCT | ||||
BV/TV | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 13.4 ± 0.5D | 12.5 ± 0.04D | SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH |
Conn.D | 80 ± 7 | 111 ± 7 D | 109 ± 7D | OPG-Fc>VEH |
Proximal Tibia pQCT | ||||
Total vBMD | 382 ± 5 | 528 ± 6LD | 507 ± 5D | SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH |
L5 Vertebra pQCT | ||||
Total vBMD | 298 ± 6 | 345 ± 4D | 331 ± 6LLD | SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH |
Data are presented at mean ± SEM. 2-way-ANOVA differences are presented in the right-most column. Significant differences within Loading (GC vs. SF) or Drug (VEH vs. OPG-Fc) were tested by a Tukey follow-up test (significance set at P<0.05). Loading (L) indicates a significant difference between SF and GC within VEH or OPG-Fc; Drug (D) indicates a significant difference between OPG-Fc and VEH within GC or SF.