Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2015 Aug 28;81:562–572. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.08.021

Table 3.

Summary of proximal tibia and humerus trabecular microarchitecture parameters and tibia and fifth lumbar vertebrae volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) collected from female C57BL/6J mice (77-days-old at euthanasia). Mice were assigned to one of five groups (n=12/group): Baseline, Ground Control (GC) with Vehicle (VEH; phosphate-buffered saline), GC with Osteoprotegerin (OPG-Fc; 20 mg/kg), Spaceflight (SF) with VEH, and SF with OPG-Fc. The duration of microgravity exposure during SF was 12 days.

Ground Control Spaceflight
Baseline Vehicle OPG-Fc Vehicle OPG-Fc 2-Way ANOVA
Proximal Tibia μCT
BV/TV 5.7 ± 0.4 9.2 ± 0.5 10.5 ± 0.6D 6.8 ± 0.4L 10.6 ± 0.3 D OPG-Fc>VEH
Conn.D 30 ± 7 88 ± 8 102 ± 10 64 ± 7 113 ± 7 D OPG-Fc>VEH
SMI 3.08 ± 0.06 2.63 ± 0.07 2.52 ± 0.06 2.79 ± 0.05L 2.46 ± 0.03D OPG-Fc<VEH
Tb.N 4.07 ± 0.07 4.44 ± 0.1 4.88 ± 0.07D 4.61 ± 0.06 4.80 ± 0.08 OPG-Fc>VEH
Tb.Th 35.9 ± 0.7 40.4 ± 0.4 40.2 ± 0.9 33.9 ± 0.8L 40.1 ± 0.5D SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH
Tb.Sp 247 ± 5 226 ± 6 203 ± 4D 217 ± 3 206 ± 4 OPG-Fc<VEH
Proximal Humerus μCT
BV/TV 10.4 ± 0.5 10.0 ± 0.6 13.4 ± 0.5D 8.9 ± 0.4 12.5 ± 0.04D SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH
Conn.D 80 ± 7 73 ± 9 111 ± 7 D 78 ± 10 109 ± 7D OPG-Fc>VEH
Proximal Tibia pQCT
Total vBMD 382 ± 5 432 ± 6 528 ± 6LD 383 ± 5L 507 ± 5D SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH
L5 Vertebra pQCT
Total vBMD 298 ± 6 311 ± 5 345 ± 4D 291 ± 5L 331 ± 6LLD SF<GC; OPG-Fc>VEH

Data are presented at mean ± SEM. 2-way-ANOVA differences are presented in the right-most column. Significant differences within Loading (GC vs. SF) or Drug (VEH vs. OPG-Fc) were tested by a Tukey follow-up test (significance set at P<0.05). Loading (L) indicates a significant difference between SF and GC within VEH or OPG-Fc; Drug (D) indicates a significant difference between OPG-Fc and VEH within GC or SF.