Skip to main content
BJS Open logoLink to BJS Open
. 2021 Mar 3;5(1):zraa061. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa061

Radiomics: a new tool to differentiate adrenocortical adenoma from carcinoma

F Torresan 1, F Crimì 2, F Ceccato 3, F Zavan 4, M Barbot 5, C Lacognata 6, R Motta 7, C Armellin 8, C Scaroni 9, E Quaia 10, C Campi 11, M Iacobone 12,
PMCID: PMC7937424  PMID: 33677483

Abstract

Background

The main challenge in the management of indeterminate incidentally discovered adrenal tumours is to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. In the absence of clear signs of invasion or metastases, imaging techniques do not always precisely define the nature of the mass. The present pilot study aimed to determine whether radiomics may predict malignancy in adrenocortical tumours.

Methods

CT images in unenhanced, arterial, and venous phases from 19 patients who had undergone resection of adrenocortical tumours and a cohort who had undergone surveillance for at least 5 years for incidentalomas were reviewed. A volume of interest was drawn for each lesion using dedicated software, and, for each phase, first-order (histogram) and second-order (grey-level colour matrix and run-length matrix) radiological features were extracted. Data were revised by an unsupervised machine learning approach using the K-means clustering technique.

Results

Of operated patients, nine had non-functional adenoma and 10 carcinoma. There were 11 patients in the surveillance group. Two first-order features in unenhanced CT and one in arterial CT, and 14 second-order parameters in unenhanced and venous CT and 10 second-order features in arterial CT, were able to differentiate adrenocortical carcinoma from adenoma (P < 0.050). After excluding two malignant outliers, the unsupervised machine learning approach correctly predicted malignancy in seven of eight adrenocortical carcinomas in all phases.

Conclusion

Radiomics with CT texture analysis was able to discriminate malignant from benign adrenocortical tumours, even by an unsupervised machine learning approach, in nearly all patients.


This pilot study aimed to determine whether radiomics can predict malignancy in adrenocortical tumours. Two first-order features in unenhanced CT and one in arterial CT, and 14 second-order parameters in unenhanced and venous CT and 10 second-order features in arterial CT, were able to differentiate adrenocortical carcinoma from adenoma (P < 0.050). The unsupervised machine learning approach correctly predicted malignancy in seven of eight adrenocortical carcinomas in all phases. Radiomics with texture analysis can efficiently discriminate malignant from benign adrenocortical tumours in unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT, even in an unsupervised machine learning approach.

Introduction

Adrenal incidentalomas discovered during abdominal imaging for other indications are not uncommon findings1, with a prevalence rising with age from around 3 per cent at the age of 50 years to 10 per cent in the elderly2,3. The diagnostic work-up of adrenal incidentalomas includes endocrine evaluation to evaluate hormone function and radiological imaging to differentiate malignant from benign masses4,5. Identifying malignancy is critical, as the surgical strategy and approach may be influenced by the nature of the mass5, such as the choice between laparoscopic and open surgery. Morphological and functional characteristics are often evaluated using combinations of CT, MRI, and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET–CT. For adrenocortical masses, benign and malignant lesions may potentially be differentiated according to the intracellular lipid content, because adenomas usually have an increased lipid content that gives rise to a low attenuation mean value at unenhanced CT (less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU)), high absolute and relative washout percentages on contrast-enhanced CT (over 60 per cent and more than 40 per cent respectively), and signal drop-off in in-phase and opposition-phase MRI sequences4,6. With large masses, however, heterogeneity in intracellular lipid content, along with areas of necrosis, haemorrhage and calcification, can lead to neither CT nor MRI being able to define the nature of the lesion1. As around 10–40 per cent of all adrenal incidentalomas are lipid-poor adenomas, the accuracy of suggested thresholds may be inadequate7, potentially leading to surgical overtreatment. Malignant adrenal lesions present with increased metabolic activity8 that may be revealed by increased uptake at [18F]FDG PET–CT, but the accuracy of the technique remains under debate because of controversies concerning correct cut-off points for maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax)9.

Radiomics is an emerging area of radiology that uses a variety of computational methods to obtain quantitative parameters from CT and MRI, potentially allowing automated analysis even for heterogeneous tumours10,11. Texture analysis is a computational quantitative technique that provides a measure of lesion heterogeneity on the basis of local variations in image brightness, discriminating between pathologically different regions. Statistical texture analysis is based on first- and second-order techniques; the former determine how many pixels have a specific attenuation within a mass, and the latter determine whether those pixels are clustered inside the tumour volume.

Few studies have evaluated radiomic approaches to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal masses12,13. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether CT texture analysis could be a suitable method for distinguishing benign from malignant adrenocortical non-secreting lesions in order to strengthen the indication for surgery, even with an unsupervised machine learning approach.

Methods

The present study included a selection of patients recruited between 2012 and 2018 at Padua University Hospital, Italy, with indeterminate functionally inactive adrenal lesions discovered incidentally at imaging in patients without other neoplasms.

The study group included patients who underwent adrenalectomy at a single centre and who had an adrenal mass with a mean CT densitometry value in unenhanced acquisition of more than 10 HU and a reduced relative or absolute washout on contrast-enhanced CT (less than 40 per cent and below 60 per cent respectively), without clinically evident and overt laboratory signs of hypercortisolism or virilization, with no radiological signs of local invasion to adjacent structures or distant metastases, and with CT performed by a standardized protocol. A comparator group of non-operated patients diagnosed and followed up at the same centre, with clinically asymptomatic and functionally inactive unilateral adrenal incidentalomas, unequivocal clinical and radiological characteristics of benign behaviour (size less than 4 cm, absence of growth over at least 5 years of follow-up, less than 10 HU on unenhanced CT, absolute and relative washout suggestive of adenoma), and no history of malignancy, was also evaluated. Patients younger than 18 years, those with CT/MRI consistent with myelolipoma, cyst or haematoma, and patients with incomplete or unavailable CT imaging were excluded.

The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Padua University Hospital Ethics Committee (Protocol 0042599); all patients gave informed consent.

All patients underwent clinical and hormonal evaluation, according to the European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines1. Histopathological examinations in operated patients were performed by a dedicated pathologist14.

Images acquisition and analysis

All CT examinations were performed with a 128-slice scanner (Somatom Definition™; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), including unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans after intravenous injection of 2 ml/kg iohexol 350 mg iodine per ml (Omnipaque™; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) followed by a 50-ml saline flush. There was craniocaudal image acquisition with 120 kV tube voltage, 250 mAs effective dose, 0.5 s rotation time, 0.6 mm detector collimation, and 0.75 pitch. Slice thickness was 5 mm for unenhanced acquisition and 3 mm for arterial and venous scans; all images analysed had soft-tissue reconstruction with a 30B kernel. The arterial-phase image was acquired 15 s after the achievement of 100 HU within the aortic lumen, and the venous-phase image 80 s after contrast administration. The mean densitometry value in unenhanced, venous, and delayed phases was calculated by drawing a region of interest (ROI) along the margins of the maximum diameter of the adrenal mass in the axial slice.

Absolute and relative washouts were calculated as reported previously15. When [18F]FDG PET–CT was available, SUVmax was assessed as described previously8.

In each CT slice of the three phases (unenhanced, arterial, and venous), two radiologists in consensus drew a ROI along the margin of the adrenal lesion using PMOD (PMOD Group, Zurich, Switzerland), a specific software for image texture analysis. A volume of interest (VOI) for each lesion in each phase was created (Fig. 1). Each voxel inside the VOIs measured 0.744 × 0.744 × 5.000 mm for unenhanced scans, and 0.742 × 0.742 × 3.000 mm for contrast-enhanced acquisitions. Densitometry data in HU for each voxel inside the VOIs were extracted automatically by the software, which obtained 32 radiomic features from the image texture of each VOI. The radiomic features analysed were five first-order parameters, and 27 second-order grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and second-order run-length matrix (RLM) parameters16, as described in detail in Table S1 and Fig. S1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Volume of interest of an adrenal mass delineated using PMOD software

Volume of interest of adrenal mass on venous-phase CT: a axial, b sagittal, and c coronal views, and d volume rendering reconstruction.

Statistical analysis

Data from adenomas, carcinomas, and patients with unoperated incidentalomas were compared using χ2 and Student’s t tests, as appropriate. The level of significance was taken as P < 0.050.

Principal component analysis (PCA)17 was applied to the radiomic features extracted by dedicated software. PCA is a mathematical transformation providing a set of new components (principal components), which are obtained by a linear combination of the original ones. Principal components are ordered according to their contribution to the total variation of the data set. Features that had P < 0.050 in the differentiation between adrenocortical carcinoma and the other two groups were selected. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was built for each parameter selected, and the area under the ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity at Youden’s index, were calculated. Data for the lesions were analysed using a K-means clustering technique18, an unsupervised machine learning approach. The detection rate of adrenocortical carcinoma versus adenoma and incidentaloma was calculated, regardless of pretest classification of the disease. Statistical analysis was done using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

From a database of 336 operated patients, 19 (9 adenomas, 10 carcinomas) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. In accordance with the selection criteria, all patients with adrenocortical carcinomas had disease confined to the gland (stage I–II according to European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours classification19). Eleven patients comprised the unoperated cohort of adrenal incidentalomas. Clinical characteristics of the patients and imaging features of the tumours are summarized in Table 1. The mean size of the adrenal lesions was significantly larger for carcinomas and adenomas compared with incidentalomas (mean(s.d.) 62.3(35.2) versus 25.9(1.4) mm, P = 0.003; 56.6(42.4) versus 25.9(1.4) mm, P = 0.027).

Table 1.

Clinical and radiological features of patients evaluated for adrenal mass

ACC
(n = 10)
Adenoma
(n = 9)
AI
(n = 11)
P §
ACC versus adenoma ACC versus AI Adenoma versus AI
Age (years)* 53.5(14.4) 66.2(6.4) 71.4(9.4) 0.537 0.042 0.246
Sex ratio (M : F) 4 : 6 4 : 5 5 : 6 0.265 0.490 0.516
Lesion side 0.625 0.715 0.854
 Right 6 5 4
 Left 4 4 7
Axial maximum diameter (mm)* 62.3(35.2) 56.6(42.4) 25.9(1.4) 0.753 0.003 0.027
Mean densitometry value (HU)* 33.4(4.7) 20.2(9.2) 2.8(9.4) 0.001 < 0.001 0.001
Relative washout (%)* 16.5(0.2) 23.7(0.4) 46.5(0.5) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Absolute washout (%)* 30.0(0.2) 32.2(0.1) 63.3(0.3) < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
SUVmax* 14.9(7.2) 15.8(22.2) 0.905
*

Values are mean(s.d.). PET–CT performed in

six and

four patients. ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; AI, adrenal incidentaloma; HU, Hounsfield units; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value.

§

Student’s t test, except

χ2 test.

In accordance with the selection criteria, mean unenhanced densitometry, and relative and absolute washout values for both carcinomas and adenomas were suggestive of malignancy (more than 10 HU, and less than 40 per cent and below 60 per cent respectively), although higher unenhanced values and lower washout values were detected in carcinomas. Values for the incidentaloma group were always indicative of benign lesions (Fig. 2). [18F]FDG PET–CT was available for 10 patients (6 carcinoma, 4 adenoma), and mean SUVmax was no different between carcinomas and adenomas (mean(s.d.) 14.9(7.2) versus 15.8(22.2); P = 0.905).

Fig.2.

Fig.2

Axial CT images of an adrenocortical carcinoma, adenoma, and adrenal incidentaloma in unenhanced and venous phase

Unenhanced (a,c,e) and venous-phase images (b,d,f) of a,b adrenocortical carcinoma (34 Hounsfield units (HU); relative washout less than 40 per cent), c,d adenoma (33 HU; relative washout less than 40 per cent), and e,f adrenal incidentaloma (–5 HU; relative washout over 40 per cent).

Texture analysis showed that two first-order features in unenhanced CT and one in arterial CT, and 14 second-order parameters in unenhanced and venous CT and 10 in arterial CT, were able to differentiate adrenocortical carcinomas form adenomas and incidentalomas (P < 0.050).

Among the first-order parameters, the histogram mean in unenhanced CT acquisition showed a sensitivity of 95 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent using the identified Youden index cut-off of 22.5 HU (Fig. 3). Specificity and sensitivity of 90 and 50 per cent respectively for the histogram mean in arterial-phase CT acquisition was also observed. Histogram entropy in the unenhanced CT phase had a specificity of 90 per cent and a sensitivity of 65 per cent.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve testing for histogram mean in unenhanced CT image to distinguish adrenocortical carcinoma versus adenoma and adrenal incidentaloma

At Youden index analysis, the cut-off of 22.5 Hounsfield units showed a sensitivity of 95 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent.

In the analysis of second-order features, a specificity of 100 per cent and a sensitivity of 95 per cent was found for 10 parameters in unenhanced CT images (GLCM autocorrelation, entropy, difference entropy, sum average, sum entropy, maximum probability, homogeneity inverse difference moment, RLM long run low grey-level emphasis, short run high grey-level emphasis, grey-level non-uniformity), in eight features of arterial-phase images (GLCM autocorrelation, entropy, difference entropy, sum average, sum entropy, maximum probability, homogeneity inverse difference moment, RLM short run high grey-level emphasis), and in 10 parameters for venous-phase CT images (GLCM autocorrelation, entropy, difference entropy, sum average, sum entropy, maximum probability, homogeneity inverse difference moment, RLM long run low grey-level emphasis, short run high grey-level emphasis, grey-level non-uniformity). A specificity of 100 per cent and sensitivity of 90 per cent for RLM short run emphasis in unenhanced images, and RLM long run low grey-level emphasis in arterial acquisitions was observed. A specificity of 100 per cent and sensitivity of 85 per cent was found in three second-order features in the venous phase. The specificity was 90 per cent and sensitivity 85 per cent for RLM short run low grey-level emphasis in unenhanced images and RLM run percentage in venous acquisitions, specificity 90 per cent and sensitivity 95 per cent for RLM low grey-level emphasis in unenhanced acquisitions, specificity 90 per cent and sensitivity 50 per cent for RLM run percentage in unenhanced images, and specificity 90 per cent and sensitivity 20 per cent for RLM run percentage in the arterial phase.

Using the whole data set for each phase (unenhanced, arterial, and venous), a K-means analysis was undertaken to search for any clustering of subjects. Two adrenocortical carcinomas were outliers compared with the distribution of the other patients (potentially owing to massive calcifications compared with other carcinomas) and these were removed from the analysis. The results of the K-means algorithm for the three phases are reported in Fig. 4. Two clusters of patients were identified for each acquisition; the detection rate was seven of eight for adrenocortical carcinoma, and 19 of 20 for adrenal adenoma and incidentaloma in all three phases.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

K-means algorithm clustering of unenhanced, arterial-phase, and venous-phase CT acquisitions

a Unenhanced, b arterial-phase, and c venous-phase CT acquisitions. Representation of data with respect to the first (x-axis; dim1) and second (y-axis; dim2) principal components is provided by principal component analysis, explaining 64.8 and 11.8 per cent (unenhanced CT), 60.4 and 15.9 per cent (arterial-phase CT), and 68.2 and 9.0 per cent (venous-phase CT) of the data variance respectively. Each dot represents a subject and is colour-coded on the basis of the clustering analysis. Larger markers represent the centre of mass of the two clusters. Group 1, subjects classified as having a benign adrenal mass (adenoma and adrenal incidentaloma); group 2, subjects classified as having adrenocortical carcinoma.

Discussion

Adrenal incidentalomas are frequent unexpected findings in imaging studies1,4. After excluding hormone hypersecretion, the critical point for each incidentally detected adrenal mass is to establish whether it is benign or malignant, in order to assess the further strategy and potential surgical approach.

Several features have been studied to predict the nature of adrenal mass at imaging4,6, but inaccuracy is often reported. Although size alone is often used as an indicator of the risk of malignancy (4 cm is generally adopted as first cut-off), overlap between benign and malignant lesions can result in unnecessary surgery for diagnostic purposes1.

Increased attenuation values equal to or higher than 10 HU on unenhanced CT, indicating a lipid-poor adrenal lesion, have a high sensitivity (100 (95 per cent c.i. 91 to 100) per cent) but poor specificity (72 (60 to 82) per cent)9,20 for detecting malignancy. A cut-off of 20 HU has been proposed as a threshold for differentiating between benign and malignant adrenal masses7,21,22. The accuracy of this threshold is supported by the present study , where a sensitivity of 95 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent were found when the cut-off mean densitometry value of 22.5 HU was used for CT texture analysis. Absolute and relative washout in delayed-phase CT images has also been reported to predict malignancy23, but sensitivity and specificity in incidentally detected adrenal masses have been evaluated in only a few studies using different protocols1,9. MRI with chemical shift imaging has provided limited evidence9 and SUVmax at [18F]FDG PET–CT has limited accuracy (overall sensitivity and specificity 86.7 and 86.1 per cent respectively)8. In addition, image analysis of large adrenal masses poses a challenge owing to the presence of necrotic and haemorrhagic areas as well as calcifications.

Image-based texture analysis (radiomics) allows quantitative parameters to be obtained from conventional images, even in the analysis of large heterogeneous tumours10,11. Texture analysis has been applied to many organs, including brain, lung, liver, stomach, pancreas, kidney, and soft tissue to differentiate benign from malignant lesions24. Only two studies12,13 have focused on primary adrenocortical lesions.

One small series12 found that the mean values for 18 textural features on contrast-enhanced CT and nine on unenhanced CT differed significantly between lipid-poor adenomas and adrenal malignancy, whereas the other13, which included 29 adrenocortical carcinomas and 25 adenomas larger than 4 cm, reported an accuracy of CT texture analysis in predicting malignancies of 61–76 per cent. The latter series, however, also included hypersecreting adrenal masses and the predictive model using CT texture analysis combined with CT attenuation values achieved a diagnostic accuracy of only 82 per cent.

The present study focused on indeterminate non-secreting and clinically asymptomatic incidentally discovered adrenocortical tumours, where conventional radiology and PET–CT SUVmax were unable to clearly differentiate adenomas from carcinomas. In this study, radiomic texture analysis was able to differentiate between benign and malignant adrenal masses. Several parameters among first- and second-order features had high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity over 90 per cent), and may therefore be suitable for clinical purposes. Several unenhanced CT textural parameters also may be used to distinguish adenoma from carcinoma. The advantage of extracting images from the unenhanced CT image is that this is easier to control, imaging is easier to obtain, and the texture data extracted depend only on the inherent density of the tumour. On the other hand, enhanced CT images are affected by many factors, including differences in contrast materials and injection rates, as well as the scan delay time. For these reasons, only data from the same CT scanner acquired at the same institution with the same protocol were included in the present study.

Radiomics allows extracted quantitative data to be used as the input to a machine learning process. Combining data and using a machine learning unsupervised approach, two clusters of patients were clearly identified, achieving a detection rate of seven of eight for adrenocortical carcinoma and nine of ten for adenoma. Only one patient with malignancy would have been misclassified as having an adenoma with this machine learning-based approach. Conversely, one large adenoma would have been categorized as malignant. With a classical radiological approach, all of these lesions would have been classified as potentially malignant.

The present study has limitations related to its design and the relatively small sample size, reflecting the strict inclusion criteria (indeterminate, incidentally discovered non-functional asymptomatic adrenal masses, studied at the same institution with the same imaging protocol). Despite such limitations, these preliminary data indicate that radiomics might be a useful tool in differentiating benign from malignant adrenocortical masses, thus limiting the number of diagnostic adrenalectomies.

Supplementary Material

zraa061_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

F. Torresan and F. Crimì contributed equally to the paper and are joint first authors.

Disclosure. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at BJS Open online.

Contributor Information

F Torresan, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DISCOG, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.

F Crimì, Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

F Ceccato, Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

F Zavan, Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

M Barbot, Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

C Lacognata, Radiology Department, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

R Motta, Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

C Armellin, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DISCOG, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.

C Scaroni, Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

E Quaia, Radiology Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.

C Campi, Department of Mathematics ‘Tullio Levi-Civita’, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

M Iacobone, Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology DISCOG, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.

 

Accepted for presentation to the Nineth Biennial Congress of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons, Athens, Greece, May 2020

References

  • 1. Fassnacht M, Arlt W, Bancos I, Dralle H, Newell-Price J, Sahdev A  et al.  Management of adrenal incidentalomas: European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol  2016;175:G1–G34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barzon L, Sonino N, Fallo F, Palù G, Boscaro M.  Prevalence and natural history of adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol  2003;149:273–285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, Sperone P, Novello S, Berruti A  et al.  Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest  2006;29:298–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I, Loli P, Furlani L, Arnaldi G  et al.  AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol  2011;164:851–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gaujoux S, Mihai R, Carnaille B, Dousset B, Fiori C, Porpiglia F  et al.  European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) and European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumours (ENSAT) recommendations for the surgical management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Br J Surg  2017;104:358–376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Blake MA, Kalra MK, Sweeney AT, Lucey BC, Maher MM, Sahani DV  et al.  Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses: multi-detector row CT protocol with 10-minute delay. Radiology  2006;238:578–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Seo JM, Park BK, Park SY, Kim CK.  Characterization of lipid-poor adrenal adenoma: chemical-shift MRI and washout CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol  2014;202:1043–1050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Guerin C, Pattou F, Brunaud L, Lifante JC, Mirallié E, Haissaguerre M  et al.  Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization of adrenal masses in noncancer patients: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab  2017;102:2465–2472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dinnes J, Bancos I, Di Ruffano LF, Chortis V, Davenport C, Bayliss S  et al.  Management of endocrine disease: imaging for the diagnosis of malignancy in incidentally discovered adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol  2016;175:R51–R64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lubner MG, Smith AD, Sandrasegaran K, Sahani DV, Pickhardt PJ.  CT texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges. Radiographics  2017;37:1483–1503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J  et al.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol  2017;14:749–762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ho LM, Samei E, Mazurowski MA, Zheng Y, Allen BC, Nelson RC  et al.  Can texture analysis be used to distinguish benign from malignant adrenal nodules on unenhanced CT, contrast-enhanced CT, or in-phase and opposed-phase MRI?  AJR Am J Roentgenol  2019;212:554–561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Elmohr MM, Fuentes D, Habra MA, Bhosale PR, Qayyum AA, Gates E  et al.  Machine learning-based texture analysis for differentiation of large adrenal cortical tumours on CT. Clin Radiol  2019;74:818.e1–818.e7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Duregon E, Cappellesso R, Maffeis V, Zaggia B, Ventura L, Berruti A  et al.  Validation of the prognostic role of the ‘Helsinki Score’ in 225 cases of adrenocortical carcinoma. Hum Pathol  2017;62:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Caoili EM, Korobkin M, Francis IR, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR.  Delayed enhanced CT of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol  2000;175:1411–1415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A  et al.  The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology  2020;295:328–338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hotelling H.  Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol  1933;24:417–441 [Google Scholar]
  • 18. MacQueen J.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc Fifth Berkeley Symp Math Stat Probab  1967;1:281–297 [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, Baudin E, Berruti A, De Krijger RR  et al.  European Society of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol  2018;179:G1–G46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wang F, Liu J, Zhang R, Bai Y, Li C, Li B  et al.  CT and MRI of adrenal gland pathologies. Quant Imaging Med Surg  2018;8:853–875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Marty M, Gaye D, Perez P, Auder C, Nunes ML, Ferriere A  et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography to identify adenomas among adrenal incidentalomas in an endocrinological population. Eur J Endocrinol  2018;178:439–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Sung HP, Kim MJ, Joo HK, Joon SL, Ki WK.  Differentiation of adrenal adenoma and nonadenoma in unenhanced CT: new optimal threshold value and the usefulness of size criteria for differentiation. Korean J Radiol  2007;8:328–335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Peña CS, Boland GWL, Hahn PF, Lee MJ, Mueller PR.  Characterization of indeterminate (lipid-poor) adrenal masses: use of washout characteristics at contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology  2000;217:798–802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Vos M, Starmans MPA, Timbergen MJM, van der Voort SR, Padmos GA, Kessels W  et al.  Radiomics approach to distinguish between well differentiated liposarcomas and lipomas on MRI. Br J Surg  2019;106:1800–1809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

zraa061_Supplementary_Data

Articles from BJS Open are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES