Table 4.
Network meta‐analysis of PFS in overall population.
| Niraparib | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 (0.72, 1.6) | Olaparib | |||
| 0.74 (0.47, 1.2) | 0.69 (0.41, 1.2) | Olaparib-throughout | ||
| 1.0 (0.76, 1.4) | 0.95 (0.64, 1.4) | 1.4 (0.88, 2.2) | Rucaparib | |
| 0.38 (0.30, 0.48) | 0.35 (0.25, 0.49) | 0.51 (0.34, 0.76) | 0.37 (0.30, 0.45) | Placebo |
Results in each cell represent the pooled HR and its 95% CrI. The estimates are located at the crossing between the column‐defining treatment and row‐defining treatment. An HR lower than one favors the column‐defining treatment. The significant results are presented in bold.