Figure 4.

Moderation and mediation analysis with stress condition, using bias-corrected bootstrapping in conjunction with multiple regression analysis. Numbers on the lines show B and p-values. Solid lines indicate direct and indirect effects; dashed lines indicate moderations. Results are reported only for the stress condition. Resilience was positively related to active coping (path a: B = 0.294, SE = 0.122, t = 2.401, p = 0.019). Stress condition moderated the relationship between active coping and cortisol reactivity (active coping x condition: p = 0.009), and it also moderated the relationship between resilience and cortisol reactivity (resilience x condition: p = 0.029). The relationship between active coping and cortisol reactivity was significant for the stress condition (path b: B = −0.437, SE = 0.151, t = −2.891, p = 0.005). The conditional direct effect of the relationship between resilience and cortisol reactivity was also significant for the stress condition (path c': B = 0.409, SE = 0.182, p = 0.029, 95% confidence interval = 0.043 to 0.775). There was an indirect effect of resilience on cortisol reactivity through active coping in the stress condition (path ab: B = −0.128, 95% confidence interval = −0.329 to −0.008).