Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2019 Dec 31;60(1):410–420. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00812

Table 2.

Dihedral Angle Recovery Rates for Side-Chain Prediction on 136 Structures Using Rotamer Libraries L1—L6a

χ1–4 recovery rate (%)
overall side-chain RMSD (Å)
method library all core surface all core surface
CISRR L1 61.8 ± 0.0 81.4 ± 0.0 46.4 ± 0.0 1.68 ± 0.00 0.91 ± 0.00 2.15 ± 0.00
RASP L1 61.1 ± 0.0 78.7 ± 0.0 47.2 ± 0.0 1.72 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0.01 2.16 ± 0.00
SCWRL4 L1 62.3 ± 0.0 81.0 ± 0.0 47.3 ± 0.0 1.70 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0.00 2.18 ± 0.00
EvoEF2 L1 60.0 ± 0.1 79.1 ± 0.3 44.2 ± 0.3 1.66 ± 0.01 0.97 ± 0.01 2.12 ± 0.01
EvoEF2 L2 59.3 ± 0.1 77.8 ± 0.3 44.0 ± 0.3 1.69 ± 0.01 1.10 ± 0.02 2.13 ± 0.02
EvoEF2 L3 58.5 ± 0.2 75.9 ± 0.2 43.9 ± 0.3 1.76 ± 0.01 1.27 ± 0.01 2.14 ± 0.01
EvoEF2 L4 34.4 ± 0.4 56.0 ± 0.7 18.1 ± 0.4 1.92 ± 0.02 1.14 ± 0.03 2.44 ± 0.01
EvoEF2 L5 37.8 ± 0.3 60.4 ± 0.7 20.2 ± 0.3 1.82 ± 0.01 1.01 ± 0.01 2.37 ± 0.01
EvoEF2 L6 36.7 ± 0.3 59.2 ± 0.8 19.5 ± 0.5 1.84 ± 0.01 1.01 ± 0.02 2.39 ± 0.01
a

The best performance in each column is shown in bold. Each program was run five times using any of the six rotamer libraries, and the average and standard deviation are reported.