Table 2.
χ1–4 recovery rate (%) |
overall side-chain RMSD (Å) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
method | library | all | core | surface | all | core | surface |
CISRR | L1 | 61.8 ± 0.0 | 81.4 ± 0.0 | 46.4 ± 0.0 | 1.68 ± 0.00 | 0.91 ± 0.00 | 2.15 ± 0.00 |
RASP | L1 | 61.1 ± 0.0 | 78.7 ± 0.0 | 47.2 ± 0.0 | 1.72 ± 0.00 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 2.16 ± 0.00 |
SCWRL4 | L1 | 62.3 ± 0.0 | 81.0 ± 0.0 | 47.3 ± 0.0 | 1.70 ± 0.00 | 0.95 ± 0.00 | 2.18 ± 0.00 |
EvoEF2 | L1 | 60.0 ± 0.1 | 79.1 ± 0.3 | 44.2 ± 0.3 | 1.66 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 2.12 ± 0.01 |
EvoEF2 | L2 | 59.3 ± 0.1 | 77.8 ± 0.3 | 44.0 ± 0.3 | 1.69 ± 0.01 | 1.10 ± 0.02 | 2.13 ± 0.02 |
EvoEF2 | L3 | 58.5 ± 0.2 | 75.9 ± 0.2 | 43.9 ± 0.3 | 1.76 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.01 | 2.14 ± 0.01 |
EvoEF2 | L4 | 34.4 ± 0.4 | 56.0 ± 0.7 | 18.1 ± 0.4 | 1.92 ± 0.02 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 2.44 ± 0.01 |
EvoEF2 | L5 | 37.8 ± 0.3 | 60.4 ± 0.7 | 20.2 ± 0.3 | 1.82 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.01 | 2.37 ± 0.01 |
EvoEF2 | L6 | 36.7 ± 0.3 | 59.2 ± 0.8 | 19.5 ± 0.5 | 1.84 ± 0.01 | 1.01 ± 0.02 | 2.39 ± 0.01 |
The best performance in each column is shown in bold. Each program was run five times using any of the six rotamer libraries, and the average and standard deviation are reported.