Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;63(1):e12212. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12212

TABLE 2.

R1 Comparison of time and proportion of each behavior during working time between the no WFH and WFH groups

Crude model Adjusted model
Time spent in each behavior during working time (min) Proportion of each behavior per working time (%) Time spent in each behavior during working time (min) Proportion of each behavior per working time (%)
No WFH (n = 745) WFH (n = 494) p value No WFH (n = 745) WFH (n = 494) p value No WFH (n = 676) WFH (n = 477) p value No WFH (n = 676) WFH (n = 477) p value
SB 224.7 (173.6) 335.7 (152.7) <0.001 49.5 (34.7) 73.7 (23.9) <0.001 179.7 (17.4) 256.2 (18.7) <0.001 37.1 (3.8) 53.3 (4.0) <0.001
LPA 122.9 (118.2) 59.6 (69.4) <0.001 29.0 (26.4) 13.6 (15.5) <0.001 146.5 (12.8) 97.3 (13.7) <0.001 34.6 (2.9) 24.0 (3.1) <0.001
MVPA 91.9 (92.4) 55.3 (62.6) <0.001 21.5 (20.3) 12.7 (13.7) <0.001 118.0 (10.3) 90.7 (11) <0.001 27.8 (2.3) 21.8 (2.5) <0.001
SB bout length 30.5 (25.4) 42.8 (24.3) 0.354 24.0 (3.2) 33.6 (3.5) <0.001

Values are presented as the means (standard deviations) in the crude (unadjusted) model according to Student's t test or the estimated mean (standard error) in the adjusted model according to analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The ANCOVA was performed by adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, drinking frequency, body mass index, residential area (Tokyo/others), educational attainment, self‐rated health (good/bad), job characteristics, industrial classification (first, second, and tertiary industries), and working time (hours/day). WFH, work from home; SB, sedentary behavior; LPA, light‐intensity physical activity; MVPA, moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity.