Table 4.
Estimated health indicators for Baseline (2015) and Scenario 2 (2035) comparing poverty, minority and California EnviroScreen areas.
| NPHAM Health Indicator | Poverty Comparison | Minority Comparison | EnviroScreen (ES)Comparison | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wt. Mean (Wt. Std) | Absolute Diff (%) | Wt. Mean (Wt. Std) | Absolute Diff (%) | Wt. Mean (Wt. Std) | Absolute Diff (%) | ||||
| Area of Concern | Balance of County | Area of Concern | Balance of County | Area of Concern | Balance of County | ||||
| Estimated Baseline (2015) | |||||||||
| Transport walking (minutes, weekly) | 27.69 (5.53) | 22.35 (5.21) | 5.34 (23.9%)a | 25.00 (5.62) | 22.35 (5.46) | 2.65 (11.9%)a | 23.64 (5.95) | 22.94 (5.31) | 0.70 (3.1%) |
| Leisure walking (minutes, weekly) | 44.86 (8.03) | 52.21 (8.97) | −7.35 (−14.1%)a | 45.31 (6.66) | 54.07 (9.00) | −8.76 (16.2%)a | 47.75 (8.30) | 54.35 (9.01) | −6.60 (−12.2)a |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 28.85 (0.56) | 28.23 (0.56) | 0.62 (2.20%)a | 28.71 (0.53) | 28.13 (0.55) | 0.58 (2.1%)a | 28.57 (0.58) | 28.09 (0.53) | 0.48 (1.7)a |
| Estimated Future Scenario 2 (2035) | |||||||||
| Transport walking (minutes, weekly) | 27.88 (5.72) | 22.41 (5.21) | 5.47 (24.4%)a | 25.16 (5.69) | 22.39 (5.47) | 2.77 (12.4%)a | 23.72 (6.05) | 23.02 (5.29) | 0.70 (3.0%) |
| Leisure walking (minutes, weekly) | 44.88 (8.00) | 52.31 (8.97) | −7.43 (−14.2%)a | 45.17 (6.38) | 54.29 (9.00) | −9.12 (−16.8%)a | 47.86 (8.38) | 54.41 (8.96) | −6.55 (−12.0%)a |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 28.80 (0.57) | 28.13 (0.53) | 0.67 (2.4%)a | 28.63 (0.55) | 28.03 (0.52) | 0.60 (2.1%)a | 28.45 (0.61) | 28.02 (0.51) | 0.43 (1.5%)a |
a
Statistically significant difference in weighted mean, p < 0.01, using Welch’s unequal variance t-test.