Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;129(3):037002. doi: 10.1289/EHP7102

Figure 1.

Figure 1A is a flow chart depicting 2 D co-culture system and the protocol having three steps. Step 1: On Day 1, Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 cells or methylenedioxyamphetamine-MB231 are cultivated in 6-well plate, co-exposed or not to human multipotent adipose-derived stem cells during 24 hours. A cell-culturing diagram is displayed representing 0.4 microgram pores, human multipotent adipose-derived cells, culture medium, and Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 cells or methylenedioxyamphetamine-MB231. Step 2: On Day 2, Exposition to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- italic p-dioxin 25 nanomolar. Step 3: On Day 4, the supernatant was stored at negative 80 degrees Celsius with an icon of a test tube and Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 cells or methylenedioxyamphetamine-MB231 response analysis was conducted with an icon of cell culture. Figure 1B is a line graph plotting cell index, ranging from negative 1.0 to 10.0 in increments of 0.9 (y-axis) across time (in hours), ranging from 0.0 to 70.0 in increments of 10 (x-axis) for control, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-italic p-dioxin, Co-culture, and Coexposure. At (4.5, 25.0) 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin treatment is marked. Figure 1C is a bar graph plotting cell index evolution (slope per slope control), ranging from 0 to 200 in increments of 50 (y-axis) across control, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-italic p-dioxin, Co-culture, and Coexposure (x-axis). The data from the graph are as follows: Control is 100 percent, 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-italic p-dioxin is 113 percent, Co-culture is 45 percent, and Coexposure is 38 percent.

Co-culture model and real time MCF7 cells analysis. (A) Presentation of the 2D co-culture system and the protocol. (B) xCELLigence dynamic monitoring of MCF-7 cells, A representative graph from xCELLigence system: cell index (CI) profiles are the mean±SD (duplicate) of each condition: Control (*, vehicle MCF-7 cells, alone), TCDD ($, MCF-7 cells treated with 25 nM TCDD), co-culture (, MCF-7 co-cultured with hMADS) and coexposure (&, co-culture with TCDD). (C) The evolution of the CI for each condition was determined by analyzing the slope of the line in the interval (26–48 h). Each graph represents the mean slope (in bold) compared with the control±SEM for six measurements. The numerical information mean±SEM and p-values are provided in Table S1. (Kruskal–Wallis’s H test (nonparametric comparison of k independent series) followed by a 1-factor ANOVA test (parametric comparison of k independent series), **p<0.01; *p<0.05). Note: ANOVA, analysis of variance; SEM, standard error of the mean; TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.