Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;11:5379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84816-3

Table 2.

Descriptive baseline characteristics of included patients (n = 72).

Variable Value
Gender
Male 48 (67%)
Female 24 (33%)
Mean age (IQR*) 65 (57.5–73.8)
MRI exam 72
Clinical MRI assessment
Mean cancer volume (Mean ± SD) 21,885 ± 20,539 mm2
Location
 High 7 (10%)
 Middle 33 (46%)
 Low 32 (44%)
Craniocaudal extension (Mean ± SD) 55 ± 22 mm
Distance from IAS (Mean ± SD) 31 ± 27 mm
Depth of extramural invasion (Mean ± SD) 7 ± 7 mm
Presence of mesorectal fascia infiltration 44 (61%)
Presence of EMVI 50 (69%)
Primary cT stage**
T1-T2 14 (19.4%)
T3 55 (76.4%)
T4 3 (4.2%)
Primary cN stage**
N0 2 (2.7%)
N1 22 (30.6%)
N2 48 (66.7%)
Treatment response***
MR 48 (67%) 34 TRG1 (71%)
14 TRG2 (29%)
nMR 24 (33%) 17 TRG3 (71%)
7 TRG4 (29%)

*IQR Inter-Quartile Range; SD Standard Deviation; IAS Internal Anal Sphincter; EMVI Extramural Vascular Invasion; MR Major Pathological Response; nMR non-Major Pathological Response.

**Assessed with MRI and derived from clinical MRI reports in the hospital’s patient database.

***Assessed according to Mandard Tumor Regression Grade (TRG) system on surgical specimen after neoadjuvant treatment in 69/72 patients. In three patients, a sustained complete clinical response (with repeated negative MRI examinations and endoscopy with or without biopsy) was considered surrogate for a complete response; the follow-up (mean ± SD) was 47 ± 11 months.