Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dementia (London). 2020 Sep 9;20(5):1565–1585. doi: 10.1177/1471301220957905

Table 5.

Bivariate Relationships between Utilization and Dyad Characteristics (FamTechCare Caregivers)

Phone calls Videos
Number of phone calls Phone call duration (min) Number of videos Video duration (min)
Characteristic N ρ p ρ p ρ p ρ p
Dementia severity 42 −.16 .312 −.03 .836 .06 .714 −.02 .884
Caregiver age 42 −.06 .698 .15 .330 .21 .175 .14 .391
N Mean±SD p Mean±SD p Mean±SD p Mean±SD p
Caregiver gender
 Male 12 10.3±1.5 .064 135.9±94.1 .879 17.7±13.8 .709 121.3±224.3 1.000
 Female 30 8.6±2.7 134.6±96.2 21.7±32.1 162.4±346.7
Dyad relationship
 Spouse 29 9.3±2.5 .290 141.5±90.8 .195 22.2±32.7 .921 166.5±352.4 .876
 Child 12 8.5±2.7 106.2±95.3 17.0±13.4 118.4±223.9
Rural residence
 Rural (≥ 20 % rural) 7 9.1±3.0 .946 112.5±78.1 .558 15.3±12.1 1.000 52.4±41.8 .503
 Not rural (< 20 % rural) 35 9.1±2.5 139.4±97.8 21.6±30.2 170.3±341.3
Study site
 Site 1 22 9.1±2.4 .800 149.9±81.1 .117 28.5±36.1 .038 257.6±408.8 .002
 Site 2 20 9.2±2.8 118.5±107.0 11.8±10.1 33.0±28.9
Caregiver education
 < Bachelor’s degree 19 9.5±2.4 .433 145.2±100.5 .455 24.5±39.6 .675 259.2±446.9 .814
 Bachelor’s degree 13 9.4±1.7 135.0±74.6 16.0±9.9 53.6±43.3
 ≥ Master’s degree 10 8.0±3.5 115.5±111.4 18.8±15.2 70.6±53.1
Type of dementia
 Alzheimer’s 22 9.0±2.6 .898 141.5±87.8 .558 24.2±36.7 .519 224.0±418.4 .651
 Other diagnosed 17 9.4±2.3 135.9±107.7 17.6±13.3 75.9±87.5
 Unknown 3 8.7±4.2 82.0±68.2 9.7±9.9 36.1±31.2

Note. p-values were calculated with Wilcoxon rank-sum test for caregiver gender, dyad relationship, rural residence, and study site; with Kruskal-Wallis test for caregiver education and dementia type; and with Spearman’s rho coefficient for dementia severity (i.e., mean FAST) and caregiver age.