Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dementia (London). 2020 Sep 9;20(5):1565–1585. doi: 10.1177/1471301220957905

Table 6.

Bivariate Relationships between Utilization and Dyad Characteristics (Attention Control Caregivers)

Number of phone calls Phone call duration (min)
Characteristic N ρ p ρ p
Dementia severity 41 −.17 .297 −.03 .835
Caregiver age 41 .16 .304 .02 .890
N Mean±SD p Mean±SD p
Caregiver gender: n (%)
 Male 12 9.8±3.0 .074 149.0±122.3 .639
 Female 29 8.0±3.0 130.6±107.0
Dyad relationship: n (%)
 Spouse 26 9.0±3.1 .121 145.6±97.2 .171
 Child 15 7.7±2.8 119.3±132.2
Rural residence: n (%)
 Rural (≥ 20 % rural) 14 7.6±3.5 .240 112.1±122.4 .164
 Not rural (< 20 % rural) 27 9.0±2.8 148.3±103.9
Study site: n (%)
 Site 1 20 8.9±3.6 .187 179.3±111.6 .009
 Site 2 21 8.2±2.5 94.7±94.2
Caregiver education: n (%)
 < Bachelor’s degree 15 8.6±3.1 .842 83.3±52.7 .068
 Bachelor’s degree 20 8.3±3.1 161.0±124.7
 ≥ Master’s degree 6 9.2±3.3 184.2±130.5
Type of dementia: n (%)
 Alzheimer’s 23 8.9±2.8 .328 124.4±120.8 .325
 Other diagnosed 10 7.0±3.8 150.3±127.1
 Unknown 8 9.4±2.5 151.3±45.0

Note. p-values were calculated with Wilcoxon rank-sum test for caregiver gender, dyad relationship, rural residence, and study site; with Kruskal-Wallis test for caregiver education and dementia type; and with Spearman’s rho coefficient for dementia severity (i.e., mean FAST) and caregiver age.