Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;4:44. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00411-w

Fig. 3. Confusion matrices for SLIVER-net and the three retinal specialist annotators.

Fig. 3

100 of the 390 test set patients were selected for comparison with clinician performance. The remaining 290 patients were used to compute the SLIVER-net threshold, which was selected to match the mean sensitivity of the annotators. For Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits and Intraretinal HRF, SLIVER-net displays a similar sensitivity to clinicians while operating at fewer false positives.