Table 2.
Summary of risk of bias.
Criteria | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
References | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Quality Rating |
Seeman et al. (2001) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Good |
Yeh and Liu (2003) | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | NA | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Whitfield and Wiggins (2003) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | Yes | NA | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Fair |
Slykerman et al. (2005) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Dickinson et al. (2011) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NR | Yes | Good |
Sims et al. (2011) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Zhu et al. (2012) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Fair |
Zuelsdorff et al. (2013) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | NR | NA | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Ellwardt et al. (2013) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Tanzer et al. (2013) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Ayotte et al. (2013) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Sims et al. (2014) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Pillemer and Holtzer (2015) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Yilmaz et al. (2015) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | No | Fair |
Kats et al. (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NR | Yes | Good |
Liao et al. (2016) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NR | Yes | Good |
Frith and Loprinzi (2017) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | No | NA | No | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Fair |
La Fleur and Salthouse (2017) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Zuelsdorff et al. (2017) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Ge et al. (2017) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Zamora-Macorra et al. (2017) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
Wang et al. (2017) | Yes | Yes | NR | Yes | No | NA | NA | NA | Yes | NA | Yes | NA | NA | Yes | Good |
NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; CD, cannot determine; NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; You can see the criteria in the following link https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.