Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;11:627185. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.627185

TABLE 2.

Results of primary and composite outcome according to the study group (FAS population).

Variable Losartan group (n=284) BYF group (n=283) Difference (95% CI) P
Primary outcome
Unadjusted eGFR slope (SE) a −4.53 (0.64) −2.30 (0.63) −2.24 (−4.01, −0.46) 0.014
Secondary outcomes
Composite endpoint# 95 (36.4%) 73 (28.1%) 0.61 (0.44, 0.85) b 0.003
ESKD# 91 (34.9%) 71 (27.3%) 0.61 (0.43, 0.85) b 0.004
Stroke or cardiovascular events 3 (1.1%) 1 (0.4%) -
Death 0 1 (0.4%) -
Doubling of serum creatinine 1 (0.4%) 0 -
a

eGFR slope calculated in the mixed-effects model, no adjustment.# 18 cases without available data and 28 ineligible cases (ESKD at baseline) were excluded from analysis (23 in the losartan group and 23 in the BYF group).

b

Shown as Cox regression analysis results, HR (95%CI), adjusted center effect, sex, age, weight, systolic pressure, hypertension history and gout/hyperuricemia history.

BYF, Bupi Yishen Formula; CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease.