Table 5.

Results of the Logistic Regression Models Predicting Emotional Abuse.

	Emotional Abuse Past Year				Emotional Abuse Lifetime
	Nagelkerke R2 = .02				Nagelkerke R2 = .02
	B	SE	p	Odds Ratio	B	SE	p	Odds Ratio
Age	.08	.04	.037	1.09	.12	.04	.002	1.12*
Gender	.07	.11	.520	1.07	−.24	.10	.019	0.78
Ethnic minority	.24	.17	.143	1.28	.01	.16	.938	1.01
Number of children in family	−.05	.27	.861	0.95	−.12	.25	.632	0.89
Single parenta	−.18	.21	.399	0.83	−.16	.20	.424	0.85
Parental unemployment	−.19	.13	.147	0.82	−.33	.12	.004	0.72*
Low social economic status	−.04	.01	.004	0.96*	−.02	.01	.074	0.98
Father war veteran	−.12	.13	.328	0.88	−.03	.12	.807	0.97

Note. Gender (0 = girls, 1 = boys).

^aSingle parent families vs. two-parent families; we also conducted the logistic regression with single parent versus all other families and the results are similar (emotional abuse past year: odds ratio = 0.85, p = .444; emotional abuse lifetime: odds ratio = 0.83, p = .363).

^*p < .01.