Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Oct 6;69(1):58–67. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16834

Table 3.

Cox proportional hazards models using RA as the reference group and sensitivity analyses comparing GA to RA for the matched sample.

Group Events Total N Hazard Ratio 95% CI Wald Chi-Square (D.F.) P value
Entire Cohort 725 14,998 1.0 0.8–1.2 0.0 (1) 0.9
Subgroup Analyses
Age
66–69 54 3,766 1.1 0.8 – 1.6 0.8 (1) 0.4
70–74 129 4,460 1.0 0.8 – 1.3 0.1 (1) 0.7
75–79 220 3,634 0.9 0.7 – 1.1 1.1 (1) 0.3
80–84 199 2,122 1.0 0.6 – 1.2 0.0 (1) 0.8
85+ 108 840 1.1 0.8 – 1.4 0.3 (1) 0.5
Females 395 8,716 1.0 0.9 – 1.2 0.0 (1) 0.8
Males 330 6,282 1.0 0.9 – 1.2 0.0 (1) 0.9
Index surgery
Hip replacement 184 4,178 1.1 0.9 – 1.3 0.0 (1) 0.4
Knee replacement 266 6,472 1.0 0.9 – 1.2 0.1 (1) 0.8
Inguinal hernia repair 210 2,774 0.8 0.7 – 0.9 6.6 (1) 0.01
Hysterectomy 60 – 65 1,360 1.6 1.2 – 2.3 8.2 (1) 0.004
Prostatectomy ≤5 214 1.1 0.2 – 5.3 0.0 (1) 0.9
Sensitivity Analyses
Excluding developed dementia within 90 days 680 14,956 1.0 0.9 – 1.2 0.0 1.0
Excluding death within 90 days following surgery 723 14,928 1.0 0.9 – 1.2 0.0 1.0

CI = confidence interval, D.F. = degrees of freedom, N = numbers