Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun 27;35(6):797–812. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1630654

Table 5.

Fixed effects estimates and standard errors from mixed effects linear regression analyses of mean amplitude in the N400 time window by Target Word (HP = High-Predictability; LP = Low-Predictability; IN = Incongruous) and Talker condition in Experiment 2.

Mean N400 Amplitude
Intercept −0.360 (0.425)
p = 0.404
IN vs. LP and HP 5.547 (0.525)
p = 0.000***
HP vs. LP 1.959 (0.554)
p = 0.002***
Average vs. Idiosyncratic −0.111 (0.375)
p = 0.769
IN vs. LP and HP × Average vs. Idiosyncratic −1.340 (0.764)
p = 0.092
HP vs. LP × Average vs. Idiosyncratic 0.970 (1.003)
p = 0.344
Observations 1,152
Log Likelihood −2,171.476
Akaike Inf. Crit. 4,440.951
Bayesian Inf. Crit. 4,688.365

Note:

*

p < .05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.

Random effects estimates available in Supplemental Material S2.