Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Jun 27;35(6):797–812. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1630654

Table 6.

Fixed effects estimates and standard errors from mixed effects linear regression analyses of mean EEG amplitudes in the FP time window by Word (HP = High-Predictability; LP = Low-Predictability; IN = Incongruous) and Talker Condition.

Mean FP Amplitude
Frontal Prefrontal
Intercept −1.283 (0.890) −3.273 (1.173)
p = 0.168 p = 0.033**
LP vs. HP and IN −2.333 (0.562) −2.062 (0.594)
p = 0.0003*** p = 0.002**
HP vs. IN −2.383 (0.598) −2.159 (0.679)
p = 0.0005*** p = 0.004**
Typical vs. Atypical −0.269 (0.391) −0.313 (0.466)
p = 0.499 p = 0.503
LP vs. HP and IN × Typical vs. Atypical −0.137 (0.763) −0.046 (0.777)
p = 0.859 p = 0.954
HP vs. IN × Typical vs. Atypical 2.193 (0.935) 2.036 (0.987)
p = 0.028* p = 0.050
Observations 1,584 720
Log Likelihood −3,624.200 −1,628.706
Akaike Inf. Crit. 7,346.399 3,355.411
Bayesian Inf. Crit. 7,609.417 3,579.794

Note:

p < 0.1;

*

p < .05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001.

Random effects estimates available in Supplemental Material S2.