Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;23(Suppl 1):i143–i152. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa405

Table 1.

Electrophysiological and mechanical biomarkers comparison between literature values and simulation results with healthy model

Biomarkers Literature values Model simulation results
Electrophysiological biomarkers
 QRS duration (ms) 96 ± 9 in men, 85 ± 6 in women (7) 100
 QT interval (ms) 350–440 s (8) 330
Mechanical biomarkers
 LVEDV (mL) 142 ± 21 (SSFP-CMR) (9) 155
 RVEDV (mL) 144 ± 23 (SSFP-CMR) (10) 160
 LVESV (mL) 47 ± 10 (SSFP-CMR) (9) 57
 RVESV (mL) 50 ± 14 (SSFP-CMR) (10) 67
 LVEF (%) 67 ± 4.6 (SSFP-CMR) (9), 62 ± 7 (RNV) (11) 63
 RVEF (%) 48 ± 5 (RNV) (11) 57
 Peak LV pressure (mmHg) 111 ± 4 (12) 108
 Peak RV pressure (mmHg) 38–40 (13) 42
 Peak longitudinal fractional shortening (%) 16 ± 2%, ES mid-ventricular mid-wall (DENSE MRI) (14) 11% shortening from rest, 18% from end-diastole
 Peak wall thickening (%) 33 ± 10%, radial strain, ES mid-ventricular mid-wall (DENSE MRI) (14) 36 ± 19% averaged over entire mesh from rest
 Peak torsion angle (°) peak twist 11.5 ± 3.3° (apex–base) (tagged MRI) (15) 0°

Where applicable, imaging methods are detailed in parentheses.

DENSE-MRI, displacement encoded with stimulated echoes magnetic resonance imaging; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESV, end-systolic volume; LV, left ventricle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; RNV, radionuclide ventriculography; RV, right ventricle; SSFP-CMR, steady-state free precession cardiac magnetic resonance; SV, stroke volume.