Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;41(3):805–813. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01633-9

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Correlations between the fIRL/pIRL ratio, the refractive error, the axial length, and the size of superficial and deep FAZ. Correlations were computed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The correlation between a the fIRL/pIRL ratio and the refractive error (ρ = 0.74, P = 0.0378), between b the fIRL/pIRL ratio and the axial length (ρ = −0.76, P = 0.0280) and between d the fIRL/pIRL ratio and the size of deep FAZ (ρ = −0.71, P = 0.0496) were significant, whereas the correlation between c the fIRL/pIRL ratio and the size of superficial FAZ was not significant