Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;11(1):148–163. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-278

Table 4. Comparative echocardiography-measured LV size, geometry and function pre- and during VAD support and after VAD explantation in LVAD and BiVAD supported children based on one-way ANOVA.

Echocardiographic parameters Children who had myocardial recovery (n=25) Children supported with VAD as a bridge to heart transplant (n=78) Children who died on VAD (n=45) P
LVEF1
   Pre-VAD 21.0±9.0 [20, 0–45] 13.0±8.0 (10.0, 0–38) 13.0±5.0 (10.0, 0–45) <0.001
   While on VAD 49.0±7.0 [48, 35–68] 26.0±9.0 (25.0, 10–56) 12.0±7.0 (10.0, 0–30) <0.001
   Post-VAD explantation 56.0±4.0 [55, 50–80] 63.0±6.0* (67.0, 15–85) <0.001
LV FS2
   Pre-VAD 11.0±5.0 [10, <10–20] 10±0.89 [10, 8–35] 11.0±8.0 (10.0, 5–45) <0.001
   While on VAD 24.0±4.0 [24, 15–39] 16.0±3.0 (15.0, 3–39) 13.0±7.0 (15.0, 3–45) <0.001
   Post-VAD explantation 32.0±3.0 [32, 27-62] 36.0±7.0* (36.0, 24–53) 0.659
LVEDD3
   Pre-VAD 2.8±0.4 (2.3, 1.7–4.8) 3.2±1.3 (4.0, 1.7–5.7) 3.3±0.9 (4.5, 3.4–6.0) 0.05
   While on VAD 2.4±0.5 (2.0,1.4–4.5) 3.1±0.4 (3.7, 1.7–5.4) 4.2±0.2 (4.2, 3.2–5.6) 0
   Post-VAD explantation 2.2±0.6 (1.8, 1.1–4.3) 1.9±0.2* (2.0, 0.97–3.0) <0.868
RWT4
   Pre-VAD 0.43±0.002 (0.40, 0.38–0.46) 0.43±0.002 (0.42, 0.38–0.48) 0.48±0.001 (0.42, 0.37–0.52) 0.143
   While on VAD 0.38±0.003 (0.38, 0.30–0.42) 0.44±0.001 (0.54, 0.43-0.57) 0.63±0.002 (0.57, 0.55–0.68) <0.001
   Post-VAD explantation 0.33±0.003 (0.24, 0.24–0.42) 0.34±0.002* (0.44, 0.30–0.48) <0.001

1, left ventricular ejection fraction; 2, left ventricular fractional shortening; 3, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; 4, relative wall thickness (2× posterior wall thickness/LVEDD); *, after transplantation; ANOVA-analysis of variance. LV, left ventricular; VAD, ventricular assist device.