Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;11(1):91–101. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-897

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Box plots comparing strain indices and T1 mapping values between different Fabry disease stage groups. (A) LV global longitudinal strain was significantly different among three Fabry disease groups (P=0.005) and between each two groups (all P<0.05). (B) LV global circumferential strain was significantly different among three Fabry disease groups (P=0.001) and between each two groups (all P<0.05). (C) LV native T1 value was significantly different among three Fabry disease groups (P=0.001), but showed no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (*, P=0.461). (D) LV ECV was significantly different among three Fabry disease groups (P=0.001) but showed no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (*, P=0.340).