Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;9(4):296. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4144

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Performance of the nomograms in stratifying on the basis of risk points. (A) The difference in OS among T3–4N0, T1–2N+, and T3–4N+ patients. (B) The correspondence between the AJCC stage and the risk stratification based on the nomogram predicting OS. (C) OS in the subgroups according to the risk stratification in the training cohort. (D) OS in the subgroups according to the risk stratification in the validation cohort. (E) The difference in CSS among T3–4N0, T1–2N+, and T3–4N+ patients. (F) The correspondence between AJCC stage and the risk stratification based on the nomogram predicting CSS. (G) CSS in the subgroups according to the risk stratification in the training cohort. (H) CSS in the subgroups according to the risk stratification in the validation cohort. OS, overall survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer.