Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb;9(4):298. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4076

Table 4. Comparison between three radiologists and the proposed method for gliomas grading.

Radiologist Validation cohort Testing cohort
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
Reader 1 90 (19/21) 77 (20/26) 84 (88/105) 75 (172/229)
Reader 2 86 (18/21) 85 (22/26) 81 (85/105) 78 (178/229)
Reader 3 86 (18/21) 73 (19/26) 80 (84/105) 72 (165/229)
Proposed method 86 (18/21) 92 (24/26) 88 (92/105) 81 (186/229)