Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Primatol. 2020 Sep 5;82(10):e23189. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23189

Table 2:

Results of the final GLMM examining the effect of the test and control predictors on the number of intervals that inactivity was observed.

Estimate SE Z df χ2 p–value

Intercept −1.31 0.15 −8.82
Test predictors
 Current condition x Observation period 1 11.27 0.001
  Current condition (Continuous)a 0.34 0.11 3.00
  Observation period (Afternoon)b 0.55 0.11 5.22
 Current condition x Experimental group 1 6.01 0.014
  Current condition (Continuous)a 0.34 0.11 3.01
  Experimental Group (IC)c 0.28 0.20 1.39
Control predictors
 Age (Years)d 0.19 0.09 2.21 1 4.37 0.037
 Weight (kg)e −0.12 0.08 −1.46 1 1.90 0.168

Interaction of specified predictors.

a

Current condition was dummy coded with the ‘intermittent’ pair housing condition being the reference category.

b

Observation period was dummy coded with ‘midday’ being the reference category.

c

Experimental group was dummy coded with the ‘CI’ experimental group being the reference category.

d

Age (years) was log and z-transformed, original values ranged from 4.84 to 10.77 years, mean ± standard deviation: 6.63 ± 1.72 years.

e

Weight (kg) was z-transformed, original values ranged from 4.74 to 8.72 kg, mean ± standard deviation: 6.55 ± 1.18 kg.