Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;12:618582. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.618582

TABLE 4.

Effects of chlorpyrifos, Artemisia campestris essential oil (ACEO), vitamin C, and their combination (ACEO + CPF and VitC + CPF) on TBARS levels and the activities of enzymatic antioxidants in liver and kidney of control (C) and experimental rats.

Treatment and parameters Control ACEO CPF ACEO + CPF VitC VitC + CPF
TBARS (nmol MDA/mg protein) Liver 0.61 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.09 1.12 ± 0.1** 0.58 ± 0.06# 0.58 ± 0.09 0.57 ± 0.09#
Kidney 2.88 ± 0.11 3.44 ± 0.66 5.04 ± 1.14** 3.55 ± 0.17## 3.39 ± 0.31 3.67 ± 0.42##
SOD (Units/mg protein Liver 19.73 ± 1.21 14.31 ± 3.95 11.8 ± 1.14** 17.56 ± 2.29## 13.99 ± 1.75 15.44 ± 1.42##
Kidney 21.48 ± 4.28 23.95 ± 3.3 18.03 ± 3.31* 20.32 ± 3.2# 25.98 ± 3.15 16.43 ± 2.48#
CAT (μmol H2O2/min/mg protein) Liver 198.8 ± 10.03 177.59 ± 6.33 142.97 ± 7.34** 185.37 ± 8.8## 183.6 ± 4.7 197.61 ± 5.22##
Kidney 100.62 ± 11.04 86.31 ± 8.6 74.87 ± 6.34** 97.23 ± 6.61## 98.25 ± 9.46 92.17 ± 7.56##
GPx (μmol GSH/min/mg protein) Liver 2.32 ± 0.27 2.53 ± 0.23 1.4 ± 0.48* 2.08 ± 0.48## 2.48 ± 0.3 2.06 ± 0.13##
Kidney 8.35 ± 0.72 7.75 ± 0.37 4.32 ± 0.4** 6.61 ± 1.04## 7.90 ± 1.31 6.79 ± 1.2

Values are mean ± SEM; n = 6 rats in each group. Statistical significant variations are compared as follows: CPF, ACEO, ACEO + CPF, VitC, and VitC + CPF treated groups compared to control group; * indicates significantly different when p < 0.05, ** indicates highly significantly different when p < 0.01, CPF group compared to (ACEO + CPF and VitC + CPF) group; # indicates significantly different when p < 0.05, ## indicates highly significantly different when p < 0.01.