Table 1.
Means (SD) of HR and RSA in SFP and effect sizes
| Author, Year | HR Baseline | HR Play #1 | HR SF #1 | HR Play #2 | HR SF#2 | HR Play#3 | RSA Baseline | RSA Play#1 | RSA SF #1 | RSA Play#2 | RSA SF#2 | RSA Play#3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bush et al. (2017) | 4.26 (1.07) | 4.27 (1.04) ES: 0.01 | 3.99 (1.21) ES: −0.25 | 4.21 (1.21) ES: 0.18 | 3.73 (1.16) ES: −0.40 | 4.10 (1.15) ES: 0.32 | ||||||
| Busuito & Moore (2017) | 3.65 (1.07) | 3.40 (0.93) ES: −0.25 | 3.61 (1.09) ES: 0.21 | |||||||||
| Quigley, Moore, Propper, Goldman & Cox (2016) | 3.68 (0.87) | 3.57 (0.97) ES: −0.12 | 3.40 (1.00) ES: −0.17 | 3.47 (0.99) ES: 0.07 | ||||||||
| Suurland, Van Der Heijden, Smaling, Huijbregts, Van Goozen & Swaab (2016) | Low Risk: 135.30 (13.51) High Risk: 134.74 (12.74) |
Low Risk: 140.21 (11.40) ES: 0.39 High Risk: 139.72 (12.02) ES: 0.40 |
Low Risk: 150.40 (14.31) ES: 0.78 High Risk: 143.96 (14.73) ES: 0.31 |
Low Risk: 146.39 (16.50) ES: −0.26 High Risk: 148.38 (18.05) ES: 0.27 |
Low Risk: 3.35 (0.45) High Risk: 3.41 (0.36) |
Low Risk: 3.36 (0.38) ES: 0.02 High Risk: 3.42 (0.33) ES 0.03 |
Low Risk: 3.14 (0.56) ES: −0.46 High Risk: 3.27 (0.44) ES: −0.38 |
Low Risk: 3.28 (0.53) ES: 0.26 High Risk: 3.13 (0.57) ES: −0.27 |
||||
| Pratt, Singer, Kanat-Maymon & Feldman (2015) | Change in RSA from P to SF: 0.4(0.73) | 2.83 (1.01) | ||||||||||
| Provenzi et al. (2015) | Suppressors: 55.30 (74.04) Non-suppressors: 21.24 (18.12) |
Suppressors: 25.65 (23.09) ES: −0.54 Non-suppressors: 49.00 (62.18) ES: 0.60 |
Suppressors: 64.50 (132.83) ES: 0.41 Non-suppressors: 48.80 (50.86) ES: 0.0 |
|||||||||
| Montirosso et al. (2014) | 62.10 (124.25) | 54.14 (74.69) ES: −0.08 | 144.09 (519.52) ES: 0.24 | |||||||||
| Holochwost, Gariepy, Propper, Mills-Koonce, W.R. Moore (2014). * | 3.72 (0.909) | 3.57 (1) ES: −0.16 | 3.46 (1.09) ES: −0.10 | 3.51(1.08) ES: 0.05 | ||||||||
| Tibu, Hill, Sharp, Marshall, Glover, Pickles (2014). |
Helper-Hinderer: Boys: 3.14 (0.86) Girls: 3.21 (0.84) |
Social Engage: Boys: 3.38 (0.77), ES: 0.59 (from NT) Girls: 3.27 (0.89) ES: 0.30 Novel Toy: Boys: 2.93 (0.75). Girls: 3.01 (0.86) ES (boys): − 0.26 ES (girls): − 0.23 |
Still Face: Boys: 2.80 (0.73), ES=−0.77 Girls: 2.86 (0.79) ES=−0.49 |
Reunion: Boys: 3.40 (0.91),ES=0.73 Girls: 3.30 (0.99) ES=0.49 |
||||||||
| Mattson, Ekas, Lambert, Tronick, Lest, & Messinger (2013). | 151.47, SE = 1.26 | 157.78, SE = 1.41 | 158.07, SE = 1.79 | |||||||||
| Gunning, Halligan, & Murray (2013). | 152.2 (9.8) | 156.3 (11.3) ES: 0.39 | 155.6(12.0) ES: −0.06 | |||||||||
| Stewart, Lewis, Heilman, Davila, Coleman, Aylward, & Porges, (2013). | HP:441.78 (33.97) | HP: 409.96 (39.54) ES: −0.86 | Not stated | 3.25(0.74) | 3.14 (0.91) ES=−0.13 | Not stated | ||||||
| Weisman, Zagoory-Sharon & Feldman (2012)* | 3.45 (.77) | 3.25 (.77) ES=−0.26 | 3.63 (1.14) ES: 0.39 | |||||||||
| Ritz, Bosquet Enlow, Schulz, Kitts Staudenmay er et al. (2012). (RSA adjusted for respiration) | (n=23) 135.06 (11.5) (n=16) 137.4 (10.5) |
146.66 (12.6) ES: 0.95 147.1 (12.5) ES= 0.82 | 144.56 (11.2) ES: −0.17 142.3 (10.2) ES=−0.41 |
152.1 (15.5) ES=0.73 |
149.3 (16.4)ES=− 0.17 |
n=23 0.139 (0.020) ES: −1.45 n=16 0.125 (0.021) |
0.108 (0.022) ES: −1.45 0.095 (0.022) ES: −1.36 |
0.112 (0.020) ES: 0.019 0.105 (0.016) ES: 0.51 |
0.068 (0.037) ES: −1.3 |
0.089 (0.032) ES: 0.59 |
||
| Sharp, Pickles, Meaney, Marshall, Tibu, et al. (2012) | #Helper-Hinderer (HH): 3.18 (0.85) Novel Toy (NT): 2.97(0.81) ES: −0.25 |
3.32 (0.84) ES: 0.42 (from NT) | 2.83 (0.76) ES=−0.61 | 3.35 (0.95) ES=0.60 | ||||||||
| Conradt &Ablow. (2010). | 137.95 (9.74) | 138.23 (11.08) ES: 0.03 | 149.10 (13.25) ES: 0.89 | 150.11 (17.32) ES: 0.07 | .0142 (.0174) | .0170 (.013) ES: 0.18 | .0141 (0.0067) ES: −0.28 | .0141 (0.0064) ES: 0 | ||||
| Moore (2010) | 3.68 (1.08) | 3.41 (0.96) ES: −0.26 | 3.61 (1.09) ES: 0.19 | |||||||||
| Feldman, Singer, & Zagoory (2010). | **T: 3.56 (0.85) NT: 3.65 (0.74) |
T: 3.37 (0.56) ES: −0.26 NT: 2.74 (0.68) ES: −1.27 |
T: 3.51 (0.87) ES: 0.19 NT: 2.83(0.75) ES: 0.12 |
|||||||||
| Bosquet Enlow, Kullowatz,Staudenmayer, Spasojevic, Ritz & Wright (2009). | 135.9 (11.5) | 147 (12.4) ES: 0.91 | 145.3 (10.7) ES: −0.14 | |||||||||
| Ham & Tronick, (2009). | 143.57 (9.97) | 151.67 (11.93) ES: 0.71 | Not printed | |||||||||
| Moore, Hill-Soderlund, Propper, Calkins, Mills-Koonce & Cox (2009) | 3.68 (0.85) | 3.50 (0.93) ES: −0.20 | 3.38 (0.96) ES: −0.13 | 3.44 (0.95) ES: 0.06 | ||||||||
| Propper et al. (2008) | 3 Months: AfA: 3.42(0.95) EA: 3.43(1.03) 6 Months: AfA: 3.78(0.95) EA: 3.57 (0.80) 12 Months AfA:4.00 (1.00) EA: 3.41 (0.88) |
Change in RSA from baseline to SF episode: 3 months: AfA: 0.35 (0.90) EA: 0.66 (0.75) 6 months: AfA: −0.19 (0.39) EA: 0.39 (0.76) 12 months: AfA: 0.19 (0.60) EA: 0.12 (0.70) |
||||||||||
| Moore & Calkins (2004) | HP: 410.69 (30.64) | HP: 409.33 (28.76) ES: −0.05 | HP: 393.35 (31.54) ES: −0.53 | HP: 405.43(32.60) ES: 0.37 | 2.82 (.75) | 2.84 (0.76) ES: 0.03 | 2.64 (0.71) ES: −0.27 | 2.92 (0.89) ES: 0.34 | ||||
| Haley & Stanbury (2003) | 146.60 (11.92) | 148.79 (11.60) ES: 0.18 | 146.55 (12.07) ES: −0.19 | 151.15 (12.21) ES: 0.38 | 149.11 (13.15) ES: −0.16 | |||||||
| Bazhenova, Plonskaia, & Porges (2001). | HP:450 (28) | HP: 421 (30) ES: −0.99 | HP: 446 (40) ES: 0.70 | Baseline: 3.26 (.9) Picture Attention Task (PA): 3.77 (1) ES: 0.53 |
Toy Attention Task: 3.73 (1) ES from PA: −0.04 |
3.28 (0.8) ES: −0.49 | 3.77 (1) ES: 0.54 | |||||
| Weinberg & Tronick (1996). 6 months | 138.20 (no SDs) | 143.88 | 139.91 | 3.165 (no SDs) | 3.034 | 3.237 |