Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Rev. 2018 Sep 24;50(Pt B):113–139. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2018.06.002

Table 2.

Description and Statistics of Studies Included in Meta-analysis.

Study and Measurement Categories Play/Pre-SF SF Post-SF Hedges g

Publication UOM# SES RSA method Age+ N mean (SD) N mean (SD) N mean (SD) SF Re-union
Bazhenova et al. (2001) lnRSA middle class Porges 5 41 3.73 (1) 41 3.28 (.8) 41 3.77 (1) −0.49 0.54
Moore & Calkins (2004) lnRSA middle class Porges 3 61 2.84 (.8) 60 2.64 (.7) 62 2.92 (.9) −0.27 0.35
Feldman et al. (2010) lnRSA middle class Porges 6 33 3.65 (.7) 33 2.74 (.7) 33 2.83 (.8) −1.27 0.12
Weisman et al. (2012) lnRSA middle class Porges 5 35 3.45 (.8) 35 3.25 (.8) 35 3.63 (1.1) −0.26 0.39
Stewart et al. (2013) lnRSA middle class Porges 6 75 3.25 (.7) 75 3.14 (.9) 75 −0.13
Montirosso et al. 2014 RSA middle class Porges 4 78 62.1 (124.3) 78 54.14 (74.7) 78 144.09 (519.5) −0.08 0.24
Suurland et al. (2017) (low-risk)** lnRSA middle class Grossman 6 69 3.36 (.4) 68 3.14 (.6) 67 3.28 (.5) −0.46 0.26
Sharp et al. (2012) lnRSA mixed SES Porges 7.25 257 3.32 (.8) 253 2.83 (.8) 247 3.35 (1) −0.61 0.6
Ritz et al. (2012) *(uncorrected) lnRSA mixed SES Grossman 6 23 1.47 (.2) 23 1.26 (.3) 23 1.35 (.3) −.80 0.31
Quigley et al. (2016) lnRSA mixed SES Porges 6 94 3.57 (1) 91 3.4 (1) 89 3.47 (1) −0.17 0.07
Busuito and Moore (2017) lnRSA mixed SES Porges 7 50 3.65 (1.1) 51 3.4 (.9) 48 3.61 (1.1) −0.25 0.21
Bush et al. (2017) lnRSA high risk MindWare 6 63 4.27 (1) 60 3.99 (1.2) 44 4.21 (1.2) −0.25 0.18
Suurland et al. (2017) (high-risk) ** lnRSA high risk Grossman 6 40 3.42 (.3) 38 3.27 (.4) 38 3.13 (.6) −0.38 0.27
Conradt et al. (2010) RSA high risk/low SES Grossman 5 91 0.02 (.01) 91 0.01 (.01) 91 0.01 (.01) −0.28 0

Note:

*

Standard unadjusted values were used for comparison.

**

Low-risk and high-risk samples used in Suurland et al. (2016) are presented.

#

UOM; Units of Measurements.

+

Age is in months.