Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;15(2):e0009065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009065

Table 6. Comparison of overall performance of the modified stNS1-ELISA, the modified stNS1-ELISA (plus) and NS1-RDT.

Assays % overall sensitivity [95% CI] % overall Specificity [95% CI] % Diagnostic accuracy [95% CI] % Sensitivity to serotype [95% CI]
DENV1 DENV2 DENV3 DENV4
1. Modified stNS1-ELISA (4-pairs) 78.0 (156/200) [71.8–83.2] 100 (50/50) [92.9–100.0] 82.4 (206/250) [77.2–86.6] 62.0 (31/50) [48.2–74.1] 83.6 (46/55) [71.7–91.1] 84.4 (38/45) [71. 2–92.3] 82.0 (41/50) [69.2–90.2]
2. Modified stNS1-ELISA(plus) (5-pairs) 85.5 (171/200) [80.0–89.7] 100 (50/50) [92.9–100.0] 88.4 (221/250) [83.8–91.8] 90.0 (45/50) [78.6–95.7] 83.6(46/55) [71.7–91.1] 86.7 (39/45) [73.8–93.7] 82.0 (41/50) [69.2–90.2]
3. SD-NS1 RDT 73.5 (147/200) [70.0–79.1] 98.0 (49/50) [89.5–99.6] 78.4 (196/250) [73.0–83.1] 80.0 (40/50) [67.0–88.8] 69.1 (38/55) [56.0–79.7] 77.8 (35/45) [63.7–87.5] 68.0 (34/50) [54.2–79.2]
Exact McNemar test P-value (2 versus 3) <0.001* 1.000 <0.001* 0.063 0.008* 0.125 0.016*

(*) indicated significantly difference between two assays (P < 0.05).