Table 2.
List of quantitative FDP/RBFDP data.
Annual |
5-year (calculated) |
10-year (calculated) |
15-year (calculated) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Author(s) | Year | Number of FDPs/RBFDPs | Success rate, %, (observation period) | Survival rate, %, (observation period) | Success rate, % | Survival rate, % | Success rate, % | Survival rate, % | Success rate, % | Survival rate, % | Success rate, % | Survival rate, % | Note |
I. Three-unit FDPs (full-coverage) | |||||||||||||
Näpänkangas et al. [14] | 2002 | 195 | – | 84.0 (10 y) | – | 1.16 | – | (94.2) | – | 84 | – | – | Mainly 3-unit |
Walton [15] | 2002 | 515 | – | 85.0 (15 y) | – | 1.00 | – | 96.0 | – | 87.0 | – | 85.0 | Mainly 3-unit |
De Backer et al. [16] | 2006 | 134 | – | 73.1 (20 y) | – | 1.35 | – | – | – | – | – | (79.8) | |
De Backer et al. [17] | 2007 | 67 | – | 83.2 (20 y) | – | 0.84 | – | 94.9 | – | 90.2 | – | 83.2 | Vital tooth |
67 | – | 60.5 (20 y) | – | 1.98 | – | 95.2 | – | 84.9 | – | 76.1 | Non-vital tooth | ||
Zhang & Sun [18] | 2009 | 36 | – | 100 (7 y) | – | 0 | – | 100 | – | – | – | – | |
Makarouna et al. [19] | 2011 | 19 | 68.4 (6 y) | 94.7 (6 y) | 5.27 | 0.88 | (73.7) | (95.6) | – | – | – | – | |
Hey et al. [20] | 2013 | 31 | 78.6 (6 y) | 88.0 (6 y) | 6.9 | 2.0 | (65.5) | (90.0) | – | – | – | – | Mainly 3-unit |
Burke et al. [21] | 2013 | 14 | 85.7 (5 y) | 92.9 (5 y) | 2.86 | 1.42 | 85.7 | 92.9 | – | – | – | – | Anterior |
24 | 79.2 (5 y) | 100 (5 y) | 4.16 | 0 | 79.2 | 100 | – | – | – | – | Posterior | ||
Yoshida et al. [22] | 2019 | 129 | 59.2 (15 y) | 61.6 (15 y) | 2.72 | 2.56 | 90.6 | 90.6 | 77.7 | 78.9 | 59.2 | 61.6 | |
II.Full-coverage cantilever FDPs | |||||||||||||
Hochman et al. [23] | 1987 | 29 | – | 100 (10 y) | – | 0 | – | – | – | 100 | – | – | 3–9 unit, 1 pontic |
Palmqvist & Swartz [24] | 1993 | 34 | 50 (18 y) | 64.7 (18 y) | 2.78 | 1.96 | – | – | (58.3) | (70.6) | 2 or 3 unit, 1 pontic | ||
Leempoel et al. [25] | 1995 | 235 | – | 85.8 (12 y) | – | 1.18 | – | 96.5 | – | 89.8 | – | – | 2–5 unit, 1 pontic |
Decock et al. [26] | 1996 | 137 | 60 (18 y) | – | 2.22 | – | 75 | – | 65 | – | 60 | – | |
Sundh & Odman [27] | 1997 | 31 | – | 67.7 (18 y) | – | 1.74 | – | – | – | (82.6) | – | (73.9) | 1 or 2 pontics |
Hämmerle et al. [28] | 2000 | 115 | 70 (10 y) | 84 (10 y) | 3.00 | 1.6 | 85 | 92 | 70 | 84 | – | – | Mainly 3-unit |
De Backer et al. [17] | 2007 | 137 | – | 73.5 (16 y) | – | 1.66 | – | – | – | – | – | (75.1) | Vital tooth |
– | 52.3 (18 y) | – | 2.65 | – | – | – | – | – | (60.3) | Non-vital tooth | |||
Rehmann et al. [29] | 2015 | 71 | – | 84.5 (8 y) | – | 1.94 | 93 | – | (80.6) | – | – | 3–7 unit, 1 pontic | |
III.Two-retainer RBFDPs (three-unit) | |||||||||||||
Rijk WG et al. [30] | 1996 | 164 | – | 71 (10.3 y) | – | 2.82 | – | – | – | (71.8) | – | – | |
Corrente et al. [31] | 2000 | 69 | – | 70.6 (10 y) | – | 2.94 | – | – | – | 70.6 | – | – | |
Zalkind et al. [32] | 2003 | 51 | 48 (5 y) | 67 (5 y) | – | 6.60 | 48 | 67 | 39 | 58 | – | – | |
Ketabi et al. [33] | 2004 | 74 | – | 83.0 (7.8 y) | 10.4 | 2.18 | – | 89.1 | – | – | – | – | |
Boening & Ullmann [34] | 2012 | 56 | – | 84.0 (6.3 y) | – | 2.54 | – | 87.3 | – | – | – | – | |
Younes et al. [35] | 2013 | 42 | 45.0 (20 y) | 66.0 (20 y) | 2.75 | 1.70 | 75.0 | 95.0 | 58.0 | 88.0 | – | – | |
Tanoue [36] | 2016 | 195 | – | 37.4 (20 y) | – | 3.03 | – | 82.6 | – | 66.7 | – | 57.4 | Combination FDPs were excluded |
Botelho et al. [37] | 2016 | 10 | 10 (20 y) | 50 (20 y) | 4.50 | 2.50 | 70 | 100 | 40 | 90 | 20 | 70 | |
Yoshida et al. [22] | 2019 | 129 | 53.4 (15 y) | 66.5 (15 y) | 3.11 | 2.23 | 83.8 | 89.3 | 70.4 | 78.6 | 53.4 | 66.5 | |
IV. Cantilever RBFDPs (two-unit, one-retainer) | |||||||||||||
Djemal et al. [38] | 1999 | 171 | 74? (6 y) | – | 4.33 | – | (78.4) | – | – | – | – | – | Pontic tooth: mainly maxillary incisor |
Botelho et al. [39] | 2006 | 269 | 94.8 (5 y) | 96.3 (5 y) | 1.04 | 0.74 | 94.8 | 96.3 | – | – | – | – | Pontic tooth: 130 incisors, 29 canines, 91 premolars, and 19 molars |
Lam et al. [40] | 2013 | 39 | 64.1 (7.4 y) | – | 4.85 | – | (75.8) | – | – | – | – | – | Pontic tooth: 15 incisors, 2 canines, 13 premolars, and 9 molars |
Saker et al. [41] | 2014 | 20 | 100 (5 y) | 100 (5 y) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – | Pontic tooth: maxillary incisor |
Botelho et al. [42] | 2014 | 211 | 84.4 (15 y) | 90.0 (9.4 y) | 1.07 | 1.06 | 97 | – | 91 | (89.4) | 84.4 | – | Pontic tooth: 93 incisors, 18 canines, 83 premolars, and 17 molars |
Botelho et al. [37] | 2016 | 13 | 100 (18 y) | 100 (18 y) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | Pontic tooth: only maxillary incisor |
FDPs, fixed dental prostheses; RBFDPs, resin-bonded FDPs.