Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Dev Life Course Criminol. 2016 Oct 12;2(4):442–465. doi: 10.1007/s40865-016-0044-3

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for time-varying and time-stable covariates

Mean/Pct Std. dev. Mean/Pct Std. dev. Mean/Pct Std. dev.
Time-varying (n = 5285) Total sample
100.0 %
Youth w/ delinquent parents
47.5 %
Youth w/non-delinquent parents
52.5 %
Age (range = 13–28) 18.90 3.91 18.78* 3.90 19.00 3.92
Troublemaker identity (range = 1–5) 2.17 1.01 2.24*** 1.03 2.10 0.99
Partier identity (range = 1–5) 2.83 1.20 2.88** 1.20 2.78 1.20
Parental support (range = 1–5) 4.04 0.66 4.02* 0.65 4.06 0.66
Harsh parenting (range = −1.14 to 7.35) −0.01 0.99 0.04** 0.99 −0.05 0.10
Gainful activity 0.80 0.82* 0.79
Lives away from home 0.29 0.30 0.28
Frequent time w/peers 0.34 0.36** 0.33
Parenthood 0.15 0.14* 0.16
Relationship type
 Single 0.16 0.15 0.16
 Dating 0.68 0.67 0.68
 Cohabiting 0.11 0.12 0.11
 Married 0.06 0.06 0.05
Current relationship 0.58 0.58 0.57
Time-stable (n = 1242) Total sample
100.0 %
Youth w/ delinquent parents
47.9 %
Youth w/non-delinquent parents
52.1 %
Female 0.52 0.52 0.51
Race/ethnicity
 White 0.64 0.70*** 0.58
 Black 0.25 0.19*** 0.30
 Hispanic 0.12 0.11 0.12
Structural disadvantage (range = 0–4) 1.28 1.24 1.26 1.18 1.29 1.29
Family structure at W1
 Two biological-parent 0.50 0.48 0.53
 Single parent 0.26 0.25 0.27
 Step-parent 0.17 0.23*** 0.12
 Other living arrangement 0.06 0.05* 0.08

Source: Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001 (significantly different from youth w/ non-delinquent parents)