Table 2. Task-specific effective connectivity modulation.

Source subregion		Target subregion	Modulation strength	p-value
Attention
L-ant	→	R-post	−1.93	0.0017
L-post	→	R-ant	3.01	0.0033
R-post	→	R-ant	−1.50	0.0007
Semantics
L-ant	→	L-post	1.08	0.0012
L-ant	→	R-ant	0.97	<0.0001
L-ant	→	R-post	1.27	0.0026
L-post	→	R-ant	1.26	<0.0001
R-ant	→	L-ant	−1.49	0.0031
R-ant	→	L-post	−2.45	0.0001
R-ant	→	R-post	−3.24	<0.0001
R-post	→	R-ant	−0.22	<0.0001
Social cognition
L-ant	→	R-ant	0.30	0.0078
L-post	→	L-ant	1.23	<0.0001
L-post	→	R-ant	−0.57	0.0013
R-post	→	L-ant	1.76	<0.0001
R-post	→	L-post	1.43	<0.0001
R-post	→	R-ant	2.13	<0.0001

Note: Significant modulatory parameters (‘B-matrix’, α ≤0.01) of connectivity between subregions. Based on a random effects permutation test for the null hypothesis ‘no parameter difference between tasks’. The strength is given as posterior expectation from the optimum Bayesian parameter average model.