Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;2021:6649038. doi: 10.1155/2021/6649038

Table 2.

Fertility and mating success of mating mixes of transgenic and wild mosquitoes (TM and WM) of Ae. aegypti.

Mating mix Laboratory conditions Semifield conditions
Fertility (%) TM rate (%) Relative mating success Fertility (%) TM rate (%) Relative mating success
C 82.35 (n = 16,305) 73.37 (n = 2,576)
G1 63.66 (n = 14,128) 41.89b (n = 899) 0.72 44.15 (n = 2,084) 41.74d (n = 460) 0.72
G2 54.74a (n = 6,136) 41.17b (n = 336) 0.70 35.56c (n = 838) 40.27d (n = 149) 0.67
G3 69.17 (n = 16,464) 17.40 (n = 1,139) 0.21 60.27 (n = 2,648) 16.17 (n = 798) 0.19
G4 53.56a (n = 6,440) 52.07 (n = 345) 1.09 37.50c (n = 832) 51.92 (n = 156) 1.08

Lowercase letters are showing significant equal rates (chi-square test) between the wild mosquito (WM) and the transgenic mosquito (TM) mating mixes. Relative mating success is calculated as the ratio of the percentage of progeny from transgenic males to wild-type males; for example, for 46% TM rate, relative mating success is calculated as 46/(100-46). The number of total eggs or larvae for each experiment is given in parenthesis. Mating mixes are C (WM♂ : WM♀ = 1 : 1), G1 (TM♂ : WM♀ = 1 : 1), G2 (WM♂ : TM♀ = 1 : 1), and G3 (WM♂ : TM♂ : TM♀ = 1 : 1 : 1).