Table 7.
Comparison with the current state-of-art/relevant studies.
Articles | Techniques | Dataset | Performance |
---|---|---|---|
Tsung et al. [52] | CNN (ResNet50) | 15478 chest X-ray images (473 COVID) | accuracy, sensitivity, and specifcity obtained is 93%, 90.1%, and 89.6% |
Abbas et al. [7] | CNN (DeTraC) | 1768 chest X-ray images (949 COVID) | Accuracy-93.1% |
Jain et al. [53] | CNN (Inception V3, Xception, and ResNet) | 6432 chest X-ray images (490 COVID) | Accuracy-96% and Recall-92% |
Ohata et al. [54] | Transfer learning + machine learning method (DenseNet201 + MLP) | 388 chest X-ray images (194 COVID) | Acc: 95.641%, F1-score: 95.633%, FPR: 4.103% |
Ioannis et al. [6] | CNN | 1427 chest X-ray images (224 COVID) | accuracy, sensitivity, and specifcity obtained is 96%, 96.66%, and 96.46% |
Zulfaezal et al. [55] | CNN (ResNet101) | 5982 chest X-ray images (1765 COVID) | sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 77.3%, 71.8%, and 71.9%, respectively |
Proposed study | Seven different deep CNN networks for classification and modified Unet network for segmentation | 18479 chest x-ray images (3616 COVID) | accuracy of 96.29%, the sensitivity of 97.28%, and the F1-score of 96.28%. In segmentation, Accuracy of 98.63%, and Dice score of 96.94% |