Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;132:104319. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104319

Table 7.

Comparison with the current state-of-art/relevant studies.

Articles Techniques Dataset Performance
Tsung et al. [52] CNN (ResNet50) 15478 chest X-ray images (473 COVID) accuracy, sensitivity, and specifcity obtained is 93%, 90.1%, and 89.6%
Abbas et al. [7] CNN (DeTraC) 1768 chest X-ray images (949 COVID) Accuracy-93.1%
Jain et al. [53] CNN (Inception V3, Xception, and ResNet) 6432 chest X-ray images (490 COVID) Accuracy-96% and Recall-92%
Ohata et al. [54] Transfer learning + machine learning method (DenseNet201 + MLP) 388 chest X-ray images (194 COVID) Acc: 95.641%, F1-score: 95.633%, FPR: 4.103%
Ioannis et al. [6] CNN 1427 chest X-ray images (224 COVID) accuracy, sensitivity, and specifcity obtained is 96%, 96.66%, and 96.46%
Zulfaezal et al. [55] CNN (ResNet101) 5982 chest X-ray images (1765 COVID) sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 77.3%, 71.8%, and 71.9%, respectively
Proposed study Seven different deep CNN networks for classification and modified Unet network for segmentation 18479 chest x-ray images (3616 COVID) accuracy of 96.29%, the sensitivity of 97.28%, and the F1-score of 96.28%. In segmentation, Accuracy of 98.63%, and Dice score of 96.94%