Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Feb 10;32(4):379–389. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01395-4

Table 1.

Characteristics of CAHPS respondents diagnosed with leukemia and lymphoma.

Diagnosis
Leukemia (n=431) Lymphoma (n= 720)
Characteristic No. (%) No. (%) p-valuea
Age at diagnosis .32
 65–69 68 (15.8) 138 (19.2)
 70–74 112 (26.0) 160 (22.2)
 75–79 97 (22.5) 171 (23.8)
 80–84 80 (18.6) 144 (20.0)
 85+ 74 (17.1) 107 (14.8)
Sex <.001
 Male 249 (57.7) 331 (45.9)
 Female 182 (42.3) 389 (54.1)
Race/Ethnicity <.01
 Non-Hispanic White 374 (86.8) 621 (86.2)
 Non-Hispanic Black 28 (6.5) 27 (3.8)
 Hispanic and Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Pacific Islander 29 (6.7) 72 (10.0))
Education .03
 8th grade to high school 80 (18.6) 178 (24.7)
 High school graduate or GED 115 (26.7) 216 (30.0)
 Some college or higher 208 (48.3) 283 (39.3)
 Unknown 28 (6.4) 43 (6.0)
SEER region at diagnosis .30
 Northeast 85 (19.7) 126 (17.5)
 Midwest 35 (8.1) 54 (7.5)
 South 73 (17.0) 154 (21.4)
 West 238 (55.2) 386 (53.6)
Comorbidity count** .49
 0 321 (74.5) 530 (73.6)
 1 69 (16.0) 132 (18.3)
 2+ 41 (9.5) 58 (8.1)
Time from diagnosis to survey, months .01
 0–3 152 (32.3) 196 (27.2)
 4–7 122 (28.3) 246 (34.2)
 8–12 157 (36.4) 278 (38.6)
General health status .63
 Excellent, very good, good 287 (66.6) 501 (69.6)
 Fair/poor 131 (30.4) 194 (26.9)
 Unknown 13 (3.0) 25 (3.5)
Mental health status .22
 Excellent, very good, good 348 (80.7) 594 (82.5)
 Fair/poor 45 (10.4) 57 (7.9)
 Unknown 38 (8.9) 69 (9.6)
Urban/rural residency at diagnosis .65
 Big Metro, Metro, Urban 408 (94.7) 666 (92.5)
 Less Urban, Rural 23 (5.3) 54 (7.5)
Did a proxy help complete survey .98
 No 309 (71.7) 514 (71.4)
 Yes 55 (12.8) 91 (12.6)
 Unknown 67 (15.5) 115 (16.0)
Medicaid dual eligibility .84
 No 393 (91.2) 654 (90.8)
 Yes 38 (8.8) 66 (9.2)
Medicare advantage indicator .73
 FFS type or PDP 184 (42.7) 300 (41.7)
 MA type 247 (57.3) 420 (58.3)
Disease severity indicator <.001
 No 267 (62.1) 673 (93.5)
 Yes 164 (37.9) 47 (6.5)
Percentage of census tract in poverty .17
 0–<5% poverty 115 (26.7) 190 (26.3)
 5–<10% poverty 131 (30.4) 183 (25.4)
 10–<20% poverty 123 (28.5) 243 (33.8)
 20–100% poverty 62 (14.4) 100 (13.9)

Abbreviations: CAHPS, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey; GED, general education development; SEER, surveillance epidemiology end-results registry.

a

Pearson Chi-square test p-value.