Table 1.
Standardized regression estimates for mediation models presented in Studies 2 & 3.
| Mediation | Path estimates (standardized) | Indirect effect | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (se) | b (se) | c (se) | c‘ (se) | ab | 95% CIs | |
| STUDY 2 | ||||||
| Face gender → Anger output → Dominance ratings | 0.19** (0.07) | 0.32*** (0.07) | 0.36*** (0.07) | 0.30** (0.07) | 0.06* | [0.01, 0.12] |
| Anger output → Masculine-Feminine → Dominance Ratings | 0.26*** (0.06) | 0.42*** (0.06) | 0.38*** (0.07) | 0.27*** (0.06) | 0.11* | [0.05, 0.17] |
| Face gender → Happy output → Trustworthy ratings | 0.19* (0.07) | −0.01 (0.07) | −0.36*** (0.07) | −0.36*** (0.07) | 0 | [−0.03, 0.03] |
| Happy output → Masculine-Feminine → Trustworthy ratings | 0.19*** (0.07) | −0.45*** (0.07) | −0.08 (0.07) | 0.01*** (0.07) | −0.09* | [−0.16, −0.02] |
| STUDY 3 | ||||||
| Face gender → Dominance output → Dominance Ratings | 0.24** (0.07) | 0.32*** (0.07) | 0.36*** (0.07) | 0.29*** (0.07) | 0.08* | [0.03, 0.14] |
| Dominance output → Masculine-Feminine → Dominance ratings | 0.30*** (0.07) | 0.41*** (0.06) | 0.39*** (0.07) | 0.26*** (0.07) | 0.12* | [0.06, 0.19] |
| Face gender → Affiliation output → Trustworthy ratings | −0.12 (0.07) | 0.09 (0.07) | −0.36*** (0.07) | −0.35*** (0.07) | −0.01 | [−0.04, 0.01] |
| Affiliation output → Masculine-Feminine → Trustworthy ratings | −0.16* (0.07) | −0.44*** (0.07) | 0.13t (0.07) | 0.06*** (0.07) | 0.07* | [0, 0.14]b |
t
p < 0.1,
*
p < 0.05,
**
p < 0.01,
***
p < 0.001;
b
This CI includes 0 due to rounding.