Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;12:633319. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633319

Table 3.

Effect size of mindfulness intervention in improving loneliness.

Trials Scale Range of score of scale Mean difference (95% CI)
Creswell et al. (2012) UCLA-R 20–80 −7.30 (−13.81, −0.79)*
Jazaieri et al. (2012) UCLA-8 0–100~ −0.79 (−3.74, 2.16)
Dodds et al. (2015) UCLA-R 20–80 −2.40 (−12.01, 7.21)
Mascaro et al. (2018) UCLA-R 20–80 −6.50 (−10.20, −2.80)*
Zhang et al. (2018) Indigenous loneliness test NA (unable to retrieve article) −4.77 (−8.60, −0.94)*
Lee et al. (2019) Loneliness score as part of mental health test 1–5 (Likert scale) 0.03 (−0.70, 0.76)
−0.17 (−0.87, 0.53)
Lindsay et al. (2019) UCLA-R 20–80 1.60 (−3.11, 6.29)
Pandya (2019)@ De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale 5–35 2.41 (2.20, 2.62)*
@

Lower score indicated more loneliness; while for all other trials, higher score indicated more loneliness.

~

Obtained from original literature of the scale (Hays and DiMatteo, 1987).

*

Statistically significant result.

Conservative estimate from Lee et al. (2019).